[MITgcm-support] Potential energy in MITgcm
i.shevchenko at imperial.ac.uk
Fri Jun 12 05:55:55 EDT 2020
Thank you for the answer.
I just thought there might be something about it in MITgcm I missed.
From: MITgcm-support <mitgcm-support-bounces at mitgcm.org> on behalf of Martin Losch <Martin.Losch at awi.de>
Sent: 12 June 2020 10:30
To: MITgcm Support
Subject: Re: [MITgcm-support] Potential energy in MITgcm
This email originates from outside Imperial. Do not click on links and attachments unless you recognise the sender.
If you trust the sender, add them to your safe senders list https://spam.ic.ac.uk/SpamConsole/Senders.aspx to disable email stamping for this address.
rhethorical question: what is potential energy in a GCM?
This is a bit complicated. You could just intergrate density vertically (and density or density anomaly can be saved via the diagnostics pkg), but you really only want to have available potential density, for which you need a reference state that is difficult (impossible?) to define for general case. So it’s always set-up specific.
Details of the actual computation also depend on details of your configuration (free surface linear/non-linear/r-star, etc.)
> On 12. Jun 2020, at 11:23, Shevchenko, Igor <i.shevchenko at imperial.ac.uk> wrote:
> Dear MITgcm users,
> Is there a chance to diagnose potential energy in MITgcm?
> Best regards,
> MITgcm-support mailing list
> MITgcm-support at mitgcm.org
MITgcm-support mailing list
MITgcm-support at mitgcm.org
More information about the MITgcm-support