[MITgcm-support] gluemnc truncates Xp1 and Yp1 to the length of X and Y
Roland Young
Roland.Young at physics.ox.ac.uk
Thu Jun 18 12:16:12 EDT 2015
Hi Martin,
I wasn’t aware of that script - it works perfectly (and is so much faster!). Thanks!
Roland
On 18 Jun 2015, at 16:54, Martin Losch <Martin.Losch at awi.de> wrote:
> Hi Roland,
>
> I haven’t used gluemnc in a while because the python script utils/python/MITgcmutils/scripts/gluemncbig is so much faster. As far as I can see, gluemncbig preserves the “mnc-service” of including the n+1st velocity point.
>
> M.
>
>> On 18 Jun 2015, at 11:32, Roland Young <Roland.Young at physics.ox.ac.uk> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I am using gluemnc to combine 16 tiled files into a global file. This works generally fine, except for the following:
>>
>> My input files (one per tile, as standard) include
>>
>> U (Xp1,Y,Z)
>> V (X,Yp1,Z)
>>
>> with nx = 256 and ny=128 globally in my case (so 257 X-points in U and 129 Y-points in V). However, the .glob.nc output truncates Xp1 and Yp1 to 256 and 128 grid points respectively, so the easternmost grid point in U and the northernmost grid point in V are cut off.
>>
>> Is gluemnc supposed to do this?
>>
>> In my case the domain is global so U(nx+1,y,z)=U(1,y,z) and V(x,1,z)=V(x,ny+1,z)=0, so in practice I can get around this, but I have a load of scripts that use rdmnc to read in the tiled output, which preserves Xp1 and Yp1 correctly, and I want to avoid having to go through and correct them for single-file input.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Roland
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> MITgcm-support mailing list
>> MITgcm-support at mitgcm.org
>> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-support
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> MITgcm-support mailing list
> MITgcm-support at mitgcm.org
> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-support
More information about the MITgcm-support
mailing list