[MITgcm-support] Cost of timestep versus checkpoint
Dimitris Menemenlis
dmenemenlis at gmail.com
Tue Nov 25 10:57:52 EST 2014
if you look at end of the STDOUT.0000 file,
this information is there for your particular platform/set-up, e.g.,
(PID.TID 0000.0001) Seconds in section "ALL [THE_MODEL_MAIN]":
(PID.TID 0000.0001) User time: 1.1000000000000001
(PID.TID 0000.0001) System time: 4.0000000000000001E-002
(PID.TID 0000.0001) Wall clock time: 1.1838099956512451
(PID.TID 0000.0001) No. starts: 1
(PID.TID 0000.0001) No. stops: 1
...
(PID.TID 0000.0001) Seconds in section "SEAICE_MODEL [DO_OCEANIC_PHYS]":
(PID.TID 0000.0001) User time: 7.0000000000000062E-002
(PID.TID 0000.0001) System time: 0.0000000000000000
(PID.TID 0000.0001) Wall clock time: 6.4920902252197266E-002
(PID.TID 0000.0001) No. starts: 9
(PID.TID 0000.0001) No. stops: 9
...
(PID.TID 0000.0001) Seconds in section "DO_WRITE_PICKUP [FORWARD_STEP]":
(PID.TID 0000.0001) User time: 0.0000000000000000
(PID.TID 0000.0001) System time: 0.0000000000000000
(PID.TID 0000.0001) Wall clock time: 1.0550975799560547E-002
(PID.TID 0000.0001) No. starts: 9
(PID.TID 0000.0001) No. stops: 9
> On Nov 25, 2014, at 7:53 AM, Matthew Mazloff <mmazloff at ucsd.edu> wrote:
>
> Hi Krishna
>
> This ratio would be platform and setup dependent.
>
> Matt
>
>
> On Nov 25, 2014, at 6:34 AM, "Narayanan, Sri Hari Krishna" <snarayan at mcs.anl.gov <mailto:snarayan at mcs.anl.gov>> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Has anyone ever measured the cost of writing a checkpoint to disk versus the cost of performing a single timestep for any MITgcm package?
>>
>> Please let me know if I can clarify the question somehow.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Krishna
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mitgcm.org/pipermail/mitgcm-support/attachments/20141125/1360d3f2/attachment.htm>
More information about the MITgcm-support
mailing list