[MITgcm-support] run speed unaffected by timestep, 'deltaT'
Liam Brannigan
Brannigan at atm.ox.ac.uk
Mon May 19 12:15:09 EDT 2014
Hi Jonny - are you writing to disk in both runs? When you increase the time step you may be producing outputs much more frequently. If writing to disk is a bottleneck on your system then this could greatly reduce the efficiency gain from the larger timestep.
Liam
________________________________________
From: mitgcm-support-request at mitgcm.org [mitgcm-support-request at mitgcm.org]
Sent: 19 May 2014 17:00
To: mitgcm-support at mitgcm.org
Subject: MITgcm-support Digest, Vol 131, Issue 26
Send MITgcm-support mailing list submissions to
mitgcm-support at mitgcm.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-support
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
mitgcm-support-request at mitgcm.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
mitgcm-support-owner at mitgcm.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of MITgcm-support digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Problems (Martin Losch)
2. run speed unaffected by timestep, 'deltaT', in? (Jonny Williams)
3. Re: run speed unaffected by timestep, 'deltaT', in?
(Michael Schaferkotter)
4. Re: run speed unaffected by timestep, 'deltaT', in?
(Jonny Williams)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 09:46:31 +0200
From: Martin Losch <Martin.Losch at awi.de>
To: MITgcm Support <mitgcm-support at mitgcm.org>
Subject: Re: [MITgcm-support] Problems
Message-ID: <EEA0E79F-01B2-4528-A369-4CD21C874C3E at awi.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Hi Mehrdad,
Michael?s (very good) suggestions with the singleCPUio/globalFile flags unfortunately works only for mds output (the *.meta/data pairs), but for netcdf (i.e., mnc), the singleCPUio/globalFile flags have no effect (not implemented).
The current workaround is to use post-processing tools. I find the python script utils/python/MITgcmutils/scripts/gluemncbig most useful (requrires a working python installation).
Alternatively there is the script pair gluemnc xplodemnc in utils/scripts (require the nco operators: nco.sourceforge.net)
M.
On May 18, 2014, at 12:40 AM, Michael Schaferkotter <schaferk at bellsouth.net> wrote:
> For density in output files
>
> 1) In ./code sub directory you might have to modify DIAGNOSTICS_SIZE.h, depending on size of domain and how much data you write out.
>
> 2) in ./run sub directory
>
> a) data.pkg
>
> useDiagnostics=.TRUE.
>
> b) data.diagnostics
>
> &diagnostics_list
>
>
> frequency(k)=-3600., (For hourly dump)
> timePhase(k)=0.,
> fields(1,k)='RHOAnoma',
> filename(k)='Rhoanoma',
>
> Where k is the kth variable in the list.
>
>
>
> For combining data into single files,
>
> In ./run/data
>
> globalFiles=.FALSE.
> useSingleCpuIO=.TRUE.
>
> Also you/ll need to properly configure the mnc package similarly to the diagnostics package and compile with compiler compatible netCDF libraries.
>
>
> Sent from an iOS device.
>
>> On May 17, 2014, at 14:48, meh tab <meryzoon at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Dear sir/Madam,
>> I have started using MITgcm software, recently for modeling internal
>> wave. I have faced some problems and I could not understand the user's
>> manual guidelines related to these problems. My problems are:
>> 1- How can we add density variable to nc output file?
>> 2- When using multiple CPU cores, the results are broken into several
>> different files. How can I gather the results into one unique file?
>> Beforehand, I appreciate your kindness for kind attention to my email.
>> Sincerely Yours,
>> Mehrdad Tabatabaei
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> MITgcm-support mailing list
>> MITgcm-support at mitgcm.org
>> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-support
>
> _______________________________________________
> MITgcm-support mailing list
> MITgcm-support at mitgcm.org
> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-support
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 12:17:18 +0100
From: Jonny Williams <Jonny.Williams at bristol.ac.uk>
To: MITgcm Support <mitgcm-support at mitgcm.org>
Subject: [MITgcm-support] run speed unaffected by timestep, 'deltaT',
in?
Message-ID:
<CAA-NaP5GrO+HqD+n90Zob+M3gUM=nveeD6PvNafKZp5YkFzUAQ at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Hi there
I am currently running a regional version of the MIgcm with OBCS and EXF
forcing packages turned on. For the initial few years of the run I am
running with a very short timestep of 24s and then after that I am running
with a much linger timestep, 2400s.
I was expecting a significant increased in run speed but this has not
happened. I am recompiling in between these run steps.
Is there something that I've missed?
Many thanks!
Jonny
--
Dr Jonny Williams
School of Geographical Sciences
University of Bristol
University Road
BS8 1SS
+44 (0)117 3318352
jonny.williams at bristol.ac.uk
bit.ly/jonnywilliams
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mitgcm.org/pipermail/mitgcm-support/attachments/20140519/7c9cfdc3/attachment.html>
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 06:28:59 -0500
From: Michael Schaferkotter <schaferk at bellsouth.net>
To: "mitgcm-support at mitgcm.org" <mitgcm-support at mitgcm.org>
Subject: Re: [MITgcm-support] run speed unaffected by timestep,
'deltaT', in?
Message-ID: <5A22E78C-06EF-4A8F-A3FE-58EB9EB8C393 at bellsouth.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Since deltaT is a run time parameter, recompiling is unnecessary, though that does not answer your question.
Sent from an iOS device.
> On May 19, 2014, at 6:17, Jonny Williams <Jonny.Williams at bristol.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> Hi there
>
> I am currently running a regional version of the MIgcm with OBCS and EXF forcing packages turned on. For the initial few years of the run I am running with a very short timestep of 24s and then after that I am running with a much linger timestep, 2400s.
>
> I was expecting a significant increased in run speed but this has not happened. I am recompiling in between these run steps.
>
> Is there something that I've missed?
>
> Many thanks!
>
> Jonny
>
> --
> Dr Jonny Williams
> School of Geographical Sciences
> University of Bristol
> University Road
> BS8 1SS
>
> +44 (0)117 3318352
> jonny.williams at bristol.ac.uk
> bit.ly/jonnywilliams
> _______________________________________________
> MITgcm-support mailing list
> MITgcm-support at mitgcm.org
> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-support
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mitgcm.org/pipermail/mitgcm-support/attachments/20140519/d2729576/attachment-0001.htm>
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 12:30:32 +0100
From: Jonny Williams <Jonny.Williams at bristol.ac.uk>
To: MITgcm Support <mitgcm-support at mitgcm.org>
Subject: Re: [MITgcm-support] run speed unaffected by timestep,
'deltaT', in?
Message-ID:
<CAA-NaP4QA83X8BkdxxU6tixh-97ob-nsFFj3+UrEsfiBKP0hxQ at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Hi again
Regarding this, it seems that I do actually get a speed up of approximately
10 times from a factor of 100 difference in the timestep. Is this roughly
what people would expect?
Thanks again and sorry for the initial confusion!
Jonny
On 19 May 2014 12:17, Jonny Williams <Jonny.Williams at bristol.ac.uk> wrote:
> Hi there
>
> I am currently running a regional version of the MIgcm with OBCS and EXF
> forcing packages turned on. For the initial few years of the run I am
> running with a very short timestep of 24s and then after that I am running
> with a much linger timestep, 2400s.
>
> I was expecting a significant increased in run speed but this has not
> happened. I am recompiling in between these run steps.
>
> Is there something that I've missed?
>
> Many thanks!
>
> Jonny
>
> --
> Dr Jonny Williams
> School of Geographical Sciences
> University of Bristol
> University Road
> BS8 1SS
>
> +44 (0)117 3318352
> jonny.williams at bristol.ac.uk
> bit.ly/jonnywilliams
>
--
Dr Jonny Williams
School of Geographical Sciences
University of Bristol
University Road
BS8 1SS
+44 (0)117 3318352
jonny.williams at bristol.ac.uk
bit.ly/jonnywilliams
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mitgcm.org/pipermail/mitgcm-support/attachments/20140519/f7541a0d/attachment-0001.htm>
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
MITgcm-support mailing list
MITgcm-support at mitgcm.org
http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-support
End of MITgcm-support Digest, Vol 131, Issue 26
***********************************************
More information about the MITgcm-support
mailing list