[MITgcm-support] External forcing for deltaT < 1 sec
linzhenhua
linzhenhua at 163.com
Fri Apr 11 22:04:55 EDT 2014
Hi,
The parameters seem fine to me. I do not know what you plan to model with this two-dimensional configuration, as you use Orlanski in the west boundary, forced flow at the east boundary, perhaps these obc values are altered internally since you have also enabled OBCSbalance.
As a step to validate the model should work with small time step, I advise you first try a forced-inflow and forced-outflow case. If the velocity field in your OBEU_hr.bin file is time dependent, could you first try this file as both easy and west obc condition to check whether you could get the consistent time-dependent velocity field?
--
Zhenhua Lin
Key Laboratory of Ocean Circulation and Waves (KLOCAW)
Institute of Oceanology
Chinese Academy of Sciences
Nanhai Road 7
Qingdao 266071
PR China
At 2014-04-12 09:35:28,"Dustin Carroll" <dcarroll at uoregon.edu> wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for getting back to me, good to know that it should work. I have only used the periodicExternalForcing for wind stress before so perhaps I am setting it up wrong with OBCS.
Here is how I am setting it up in data for forcing hourly for 30 days.
periodicExternalForcing=.TRUE.,
externForcingPeriod=3600.,
externForcingCycle=2592000.,
Here is my data.obcs file, the bin files contain 720 records (2592000/3600).
# ***************
# Open boundaries
# ***************
&OBCS_PARM01
OB_Iwest = 1*1,
OB_Ieast = 1*-1,
useOBCSprescribe=.TRUE.,
useOrlanskiWest=.TRUE.,
useOBCSbalance=.TRUE.,
OBEtFile='OBET_hr.bin',
OBEsFile='OBES_hr.bin',
OBEuFile='OBEU_hr.bin'
OBWtFile='OBWT_hr.bin',
OBWsFile='OBWS_hr.bin',
OBCS_monitorFreq= 3600.,
OBCS_monSelect = 3,
&
&OBCS_PARM02
&
Just want to check I’m setting this up right — perhaps I am missing a flag somewhere. Everything is running properly with a static BC setup.
Best,
Dustin
On Apr 11, 2014, at 6:20 PM, linzhenhua <linzhenhua at 163.com> wrote:
Hi Dustin,
I have used this method for high resolution simulation forced with obc, and the results seem reasonable for me. The time step in my configuration is 0.5s.
At 2014-04-12 04:09:57,"Dustin Carroll" <dcarroll at uoregon.edu> wrote:
>Hi All,
>
>I am running some high-resolution experiments where the time step is < 1 second and I need to have time dependent boundary conditions.
>
>Normally I use EXF for this, but for these experiments I can’t because the cal pkg doesn’t support deltaT < 1.
>
>I tried using the basic periodicExternalForcing but that didn’t properly loop through my forcing files properly when deltaT < 1. Can anyone confirm that periodicExternalForcing works with deltaT < 1 or recommend a method for time dependent bc's with these small time steps?
>
>Thanks,
>Dustin
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>MITgcm-support mailing list
>MITgcm-support at mitgcm.org
>http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-support
_______________________________________________
MITgcm-support mailing list
MITgcm-support at mitgcm.org
http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-support
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mitgcm.org/pipermail/mitgcm-support/attachments/20140412/78d55929/attachment.htm>
More information about the MITgcm-support
mailing list