[MITgcm-support] diagnostics parameter

Jean-Michel Campin jmc at ocean.mit.edu
Tue Sep 10 15:52:30 EDT 2013


Hi Martin,

The pieces of code that decides when to write 
2D/3D diagnostics or stats-diags are the same, so it is strange that
you get different behaviour between the 2. 
Did you check (in STDOUT, just after reading data.diagnostics,
the section starting with:
> DIAGNOSTICS_READPARMS: active diagnostics summary:
)
that frequency and phase are really what you think they are ?

Apart from that, to get output only after 134 days, you need to 
specify a frequency equal or larger than the time-step (when 
frequency < timeStep, output is written every time-step 
and timePhase is ignored).

Cheers,
Jean-Michel

On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 06:28:23PM +0200, Martin Losch wrote:
> Hi there,
> 
> this is a problem that I keep running into, and since the search function on mitgcm.org does not help very much (as usual), I have to ask this question again:
> 
> For debugging reasons, I want the model to start from a pickup at nIter0 = 131544. My timestep is deltaT = 1200. I want the model to write diagnostics at each timestep after timestep 141192, i.e. after the model has reached the time 141192*1200sec = 169430400sec=134days. I thought that I could do it like this in data.diagnostics (<http://mitgcm.org/pipermail/mitgcm-support/2010-August/006799.html>):
> 
>    filename(1) = 'myfile',
>    frequency(1) = 1.,
>    timePhase(1) = 169430400.,
>    fields(1,1) = 'ETAN    ', ….
> 
> because it says in the standard data.diagnostics files in the verification experiments:
> #  timePhase(n)     : write at time = timePhase + multiple of |frequency|
> 
> Obviously I got it wrong because now the model writes output at timesteps 132408 (after 12 days), 134568 (42days), 136800 (73days), etc.
> Where did I go wrong, and how can I do it correctly?
> 
> Analogously in the diag_stats name list, I specified stats_freq=1 and stats_phase=169430400 and got output every time step from the very beginning (so already at time step 131544). Why are the two parameter sets behaving so differently?
> 
> Martin
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> MITgcm-support mailing list
> MITgcm-support at mitgcm.org
> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-support



More information about the MITgcm-support mailing list