[MITgcm-support] Diagnosing OBCS heat contribution

Menemenlis, Dimitris (3248) Dimitris.Menemenlis at jpl.nasa.gov
Thu Nov 14 16:46:18 EST 2013


Not sure if this is the "smartest" way, but one way would be to save following diagnostics and
then grab what you need at your boundaries.

   107 |ADVx_TH | 15 |   108 |UU      MR|degC.m^3/s      |Zonal      Advective Flux of Pot.Temperature
   108 |ADVy_TH | 15 |   107 |VV      MR|degC.m^3/s      |Meridional Advective Flux of Pot.Temperature
   110 |DFxE_TH | 15 |   111 |UU      MR|degC.m^3/s      |Zonal      Diffusive Flux of Pot.Temperature
   111 |DFyE_TH | 15 |   110 |VV      MR|degC.m^3/s      |Meridional Diffusive Flux of Pot.Temperature

Dimitris Menemenlis

On Nov 14, 2013, at 1:13 PM, Chris Horvat wrote:

> Hi all, 
> 
> I'm wondering if anyone has tackled the problem of computing or diagnosing the contribution that open boundaries have to a run's temperature budget. Since they override the temperature, there's some artificial heat flux caused by the OBCS. 
> 
> At present I've been diagnosing it by computing the difference between the surface heat flux and the implied heat flux by changes in the total temperature of the model, but this is cludgy and post-model-run. Are there any smarter ways to do this?
> 
> Chris
> 
> _______________________________________________
> MITgcm-support mailing list
> MITgcm-support at mitgcm.org
> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-support




More information about the MITgcm-support mailing list