[MITgcm-support] Diagnosing OBCS heat contribution
Menemenlis, Dimitris (3248)
Dimitris.Menemenlis at jpl.nasa.gov
Thu Nov 14 16:46:18 EST 2013
Not sure if this is the "smartest" way, but one way would be to save following diagnostics and
then grab what you need at your boundaries.
107 |ADVx_TH | 15 | 108 |UU MR|degC.m^3/s |Zonal Advective Flux of Pot.Temperature
108 |ADVy_TH | 15 | 107 |VV MR|degC.m^3/s |Meridional Advective Flux of Pot.Temperature
110 |DFxE_TH | 15 | 111 |UU MR|degC.m^3/s |Zonal Diffusive Flux of Pot.Temperature
111 |DFyE_TH | 15 | 110 |VV MR|degC.m^3/s |Meridional Diffusive Flux of Pot.Temperature
Dimitris Menemenlis
On Nov 14, 2013, at 1:13 PM, Chris Horvat wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm wondering if anyone has tackled the problem of computing or diagnosing the contribution that open boundaries have to a run's temperature budget. Since they override the temperature, there's some artificial heat flux caused by the OBCS.
>
> At present I've been diagnosing it by computing the difference between the surface heat flux and the implied heat flux by changes in the total temperature of the model, but this is cludgy and post-model-run. Are there any smarter ways to do this?
>
> Chris
>
> _______________________________________________
> MITgcm-support mailing list
> MITgcm-support at mitgcm.org
> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-support
More information about the MITgcm-support
mailing list