[MITgcm-support] glue netcdf files efficiently
Oliver Jahn
jahn at MIT.EDU
Wed Jan 9 08:36:27 EST 2013
Hi Yinghui,
thanks for pointing this out. I wasn't thinking when I wrote about
python 3. One would have to generate a python 3 version using 2to3.
I'll look into this when I have time.
Oliver
On 2013-01-09 07:48, 何映晖 wrote:
> Hi Oliver et al
>
> The gluemncbig works fine with python 2.7.3 and numpy 1.6.2 and is very
> efficient.
>
> By the way, I also have tried to run it with python 3.3.0.
> Unfortunately, it is aborted with the following error message.
>
>
> File
> "/home/Phoenix/MITgcm_c64b/utils/python/MITgcmutils/scripts/gluemncbig",
> line 1190
> print 'Files to be read:'
> ^
> SyntaxError: invalid syntax
>
>
> So it seems that the syntax is not compatible with python 3.3.0.
>
> The bash script gluemnc still can not work with small files. I guess the
> problem may be related with the syntax of different nco version. Because
> I had once successfully run it on system CentOS 5 until the code was
> ported on system CentOS 6. Since building the nco source code is
> complicated, I installed the nco 4.0.5 by .rpm file which is the only
> version I can find which is compatible with CentOS 6. And I can't
> remember the nco version I used before.
>
> Since I didn't know the nco much, I haven't confirmed my supposition.
> And what more, I think the python script, gluemncbig, is more efficient
> than the script gluemnc I used before.
>
> Thanks,
> Yinghui
>
> 2013/1/8 Oliver Jahn <jahn at mit.edu <mailto:jahn at mit.edu>>
>
> On 2013-01-08 08:09, 何映晖 wrote:
>
> Finally, I try to use the python script /gluemncbig/. Since I
> don't know
>
> the python at all, it also doesn't work.
>
> $ gluemncbig -o state.glob.nc <http://state.glob.nc>
> <http://state.glob.nc> state.0000000000.t00*
>
> Tiled dimensions: Yp1 Y X Xp1
> Record dimension: T
> Writing non-record variables
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File
> "/home/Phoenix/MITgcm_c64b/__utils/python/MITgcmutils/__scripts/gluemncbig",
> line 1336, in <module>
> if progress and not verbose: sys.stderr.write('Writing {}
> records:
> '.format(nrec))
> ValueError: zero length field name in format
>
> Any ideas why I get those errors? Considering the files which I
> want to
> combine are so large (about 50G), which method is more efficient?
>
>
> Hi Yinghui
>
> the python error is because you don't have python >= 2.7 or >= 3.2.
> I've just checked in a fix for this that should work on older
> python. This script should work as long as each individual variable
> (or time record) fits in memory. Let me know how it goes!
>
> Oliver
>
>
> _________________________________________________
> MITgcm-support mailing list
> MITgcm-support at mitgcm.org <mailto:MITgcm-support at mitgcm.org>
> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/__listinfo/mitgcm-support
> <http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-support>
>
>
>
>
> --
> 何映晖
> 南海海洋研究所
> 中国科学院
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> MITgcm-support mailing list
> MITgcm-support at mitgcm.org
> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-support
>
More information about the MITgcm-support
mailing list