[MITgcm-support] seaice setup for idealized ice leads experiment
Mehmet Ilicak
milicak at rsmas.miami.edu
Fri Sep 14 15:51:42 EDT 2012
Hi all,
I'm trying to perform some idealized ice leads experiments using mitgcm
with seaice pkg in a nonhydrostatic setup.
I am very new to ice modelling, so I decided to seek for help.
The domain is 10x10km periodic.
Initial condition of temperature is uniform and -2C in the ocean. For
salinity upper 50m 32psu and below that it is 32.2psu.
T/S advection sheme is 33.
It is linear equation of state. The freezing temperature is also -2C.
There is initial ice thickness (2 meter) everywhere except 1x1 km in the
middle of the domain. In that area I put random ice thickness order of
2.5 cm.
I also add snow thickness (20cm) on top of the ice to increase insulation.
I am using exf package to force the ocean-ice model with air
temperature. The air temperature is uniform and 253K (-20C) in the file.
The rest of the forcing fields are not defined.
This setup is very similar to Matsumura and Hasumi (2006).
What I was expecting is that in the lead opening, there will be ice
formation because of the cold air. And when the ice forms, it rejects
salt, so the water will get denser and sink in that 1x1 km area.
But I've seen some additional salt rejection everywhere under ice.
I've attached a picture of salinity x-z section. (See the top of the
domain, you can see saltier water everywhere)
I don't understand why there is more salty water on the surface far away
from the ice leads.
In addition, sea ice thickness is increasing everywhere.
I think, there might be something wrong in my setup.
The paper that I cite does not mention this salinity anomaly.
I changed the ice conductivity from 2 to 0.02. It reduces the salt
anomaly under ice far from ice leads but it also reduces the salt
rejection in the ice leads.
I increase initial sea ice thickness around 10 meter, but still I saw
the anomaly and I thought ice thickness is not realistic.
Finally I changed the air temperature to -2C everywhere except the
ice-leads area. But the salt anomaly is still there.
I appreciate any suggestion.
Best,
Mehmet
Here is my data.seaice;
&SEAICE_PARM01
#- seaice dynamics params:
LSR_ERROR = 1.E-12,
SEAICE_no_slip = .TRUE.,
SEAICE_drag = 0.001,
ICE2WATR = 0.92D0,
HeffFile = 'HEFF.init',
HsnowFile = 'HSNOW.init',
SEAICE_salt0 = 10.0,
#- constant seawater freezing point:
SEAICE_tempFrz0 = -2.0,
SEAICE_saltFrac = 0.3,
SEAICE_dTempFrz_dS = 0.0,
# MIN_ATEMP = -40.,
# MIN_TICE = -40.,
SEAICEadvScheme = 7,
# for adjoint simulations you will need
# SEAICEadvScheme = 30,
#- seaice thermodyn params:
SEAICE_multDim = 1,
SEAICE_wetAlbTemp = 0.0,
# this value should be default for the McPhee parameterization
SEAICE_mcPheeTaper = 0.92,
#- seaice I/O params:
SEAICEwriteState = .TRUE.,
&
&SEAICE_PARM03
SItrNumInUse = 1,
SItrName(1) = 'salinity',
SItrFromOceanFrac(1) = 0.3,
&
Ref:
Brine-Driven Eddies under Sea Ice Leads and Their Impact on the Arctic
Ocean
Mixed Layer . YOSHIMASA MATSUMURA AND HIROYASU HASUMI 2006
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: salt_xzsection.png
Type: image/png
Size: 11218 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mitgcm.org/pipermail/mitgcm-support/attachments/20120914/d355a61d/attachment.png>
More information about the MITgcm-support
mailing list