[MITgcm-support] (no subject)
q li
qliuri at yahoo.com
Tue Mar 20 09:52:20 EDT 2012
Thanks, Serge. I use gfortran for the MPICH. Maybe it is only related to the operational system, rather than the MITgcm. There is no this problem in other clusters.
Li
________________________________
From: fancer fancer <fancer.lancer at gmail.com>
To: mitgcm-support at mitgcm.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2012 1:36 PM
Subject: Re: [MITgcm-support] (no subject)
Hi, q Li
I don't use mpif77, but I compile with gfortran. I take the following output of libraries checking:
=== Checking system libraries ===
Do we have the system() command using gfortran... yes
Do we have the fdate() command using gfortran... yes
Do we have the etime() command using gfortran... no
Can we call simple C routines (here, "cloc()") using gfortran... yes
Can we unlimit the stack size using gfortran... yes
Can we register a signal handler using gfortran... yes
Can we use stat() through C calls... yes
Can we create NetCDF-enabled binaries... yes
Absence of etime()'s maintenance doesn't interfere with my simulations at all. To tell the truth I never paid my attention on this output.
It you try to find all calls of the etime() (ETIME()) function You'll see, that it isn't used in the model/ and pkg/ sources. Therefore in my opinion absence of the etime() function is not so critical.
But the comprehensive answer about why it is checked here I would hear too.
Suncerely,
Serge V. Semin
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 2:38 AM, q li <qliuri at yahoo.com> wrote:
Hi,
>
>
>When I genmake2 the codes on a cluster, I got this feedback, although I still can compile and run the model and the output also seems all right.
>
>
>=== Checking system libraries ===
> Do we have the system() command using mpif77... yes
> Do we have the fdate() command using mpif77... yes
> Do we have the etime() command using mpif77... no
> Can we call simple C routines (here, "cloc()") using mpif77... yes
> Can we unlimit the stack size using mpif77... yes
> Can we register a signal handler using mpif77... yes
> Can we use stat() through C calls... yes
> Can we create NetCDF-enabled binaries... no
>
>
>Anyone knows how to make etime() to "yes"? Will this interfere with my simulation?
>
>
>Best regards,
>
>
>Li
>_______________________________________________
>MITgcm-support mailing list
>MITgcm-support at mitgcm.org
>http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-support
>
>
_______________________________________________
MITgcm-support mailing list
MITgcm-support at mitgcm.org
http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-support
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mitgcm.org/pipermail/mitgcm-support/attachments/20120320/93b0780f/attachment.htm>
More information about the MITgcm-support
mailing list