[MITgcm-support] Re: Shortwave radiation

[Martin Losch]

Hi Georges,

with your options you should be able to get a reasonable solution. I  
need more information about you configuration. Could you send me your  
stdout (gzipped,please), or your data.exf, data.pkg, and data?

For more diagnostics, have a look at  the forcing fields, as the model  
"sees" them, eg. all diagnostics that start with EXF and the ones like  
oceQnet, oceQsw, etc. Maybe you can find something unexpected.

M.



On Sep 14, 2009, at 11:08 PM, Georges Djoumna wrote:

> Hi Martin,
>
> in EXF_OPTIONS.h I've set
>
> #undef  ALLOW_ATM_TEMP
> #define  ALLOW_ATM_WIND
> #define  ALLOW_DOWNWARD_RADIATION
> #undef  ALLOW_RUNOFF
> #if (defined (ALLOW_ATM_TEMP) || \
>     defined (ALLOW_ATM_WIND))
> # define ALLOW_BULKFORMULAE
> # undef ALLOW_BULK_LARGEYEAGER04
> #endif
>
> With these setting I am  forcing the model with wind and sw-radiation.
> When I look in exf_bulkformulae.F, if the flag ALLOW_ATM_TEMP is set  
> to undefined the sensible and latent heat fluxes are zero. Am I right?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Georges
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> MITgcm-support mailing list
> MITgcm-support at mitgcm.org
> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-support