[MITgcm-support] exf interp

Dimitris Menemenlis menemenlis at jpl.nasa.gov
Fri Oct 16 20:03:36 EDT 2009


Matt, I hardcoded bilinear interpolation for tracer fields because  
overshoots can be problematic and bicubic for wind velocity (see  
exf_set_uv.F) for stress fields because the second derivative  
matters.  I would recommend to leave as is.  Other combinations can  
(or did) cause trouble.  Dimitris

On Oct 16, 2009, at 3:21 PM, Matthew Mazloff wrote:

> Hello,
>
> It appears the model is equipped to do both bilinear and bicubic
> interpolation for exf_interp.F.  Interp_method, however, is hardcoded
> to bilinear interpolation.  This does matter for my 1/16 degree set-
> up.  Can anyone confirm that the bicubic interpolation is ok -- and I
> can go ahead and use this option.
>
> -Thanks,
> Matt
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> MITgcm-support mailing list
> MITgcm-support at mitgcm.org
> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-support




More information about the MITgcm-support mailing list