[MITgcm-support] Re: [MITgcm-cvs] MITgcm/model/src CVS Commit

[Jean-Michel Campin]

Hi Martin,

I am little bit confused:
- we do have the proper exchange for dxV & dyU (In fact, I think we
  now have the full familly of exch S/R), may be not the adjoint version.
- If there is a division by zero somewhere in the code, I would prefer 
  to fix it (for all platforms, not only for NEC_SX) rather than
  leave with it.
Can you point where the problem was ?
Thanks,
Jean-Michel

On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 02:51:56AM -0500, Martin Losch wrote:
> Update of /u/gcmpack/MITgcm/model/src
> In directory forge:/tmp/cvs-serv13873/model/src
> 
> Modified Files:
> 	ini_curvilinear_grid.F 
> Log Message:
> check my hack for SX8 compiler, because I keep stumbling over it.
> (forgive me, Jean-Michel):
> terrible hack to make sure that recip_dxV and recip_dyU are never zero,
> until we have a proper exchange for them. Most compilers do not seem
> to mind divisions by zero in the overlaps, as long as the results are
> not used anywhere, but sxf90 does.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> MITgcm-cvs mailing list
> MITgcm-cvs at mitgcm.org
> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-cvs