[MITgcm-support] nonlinear free surface and eta

[Jean-Michel Campin]

Hello,

Martin is right, and you can also find a lot of information
about OBCS (and Eta) searching the mitgcm.org web site.
for instance:
http://dev.mitgcm.org/pipermail/mitgcm-support/2005-October/003491.html
Jean-Michel

On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 05:40:11PM -0800, Riema Rachmayani wrote:
> hi, all
> 
> why we have to choose nonlinear surface or nonhydrostatic in internal wave verification, we cant use both in the same time?? as i know...evolution of solitary wave is much better if we use nonlinear freesurface and nonhydrostatic.
> 
> in my case, i choose nonhydrostatic mode rather than nonlinear free surface, as consequences of  it i cant describe OB*Eta at open boundaries, well, i have try to describe OBWEta and OBEEta in obcs_calc.F, but in obcs_apply_eta.F, there some code to set eta = zero at open boundaries except when we use nonlinear free surface, so i always have zero value at open boundaries for eta, any idea to solve it?? where i can found connection between eta(1), eta (2), eta(Nx), eta(Nx-1)??
> 
> thank you all,
> regards, 
> rima
> 
> Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
> _______________________________________________
> MITgcm-support mailing list
> MITgcm-support at mitgcm.org
> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-support