[MITgcm-support] noise in high resolution run
mlosch at awi-bremerhaven.de
Tue Apr 4 06:32:48 EDT 2006
my final comment about the noise in my 1/6th degree run:
It's gone! With a very high friction parameter of 1e12 for both
viscosity and diffusivity (which is almost the maximum allowed) and
cosPower=4., I have now a 1year run which looks good to me (at first
sight), see http://mitgcm.org/~mlosch/noise6.png
My time step is 600s. When I reduce the friction, which I think I
should be able to do, then I run into stability problems after some
integration time (e.g. 5e11 allows me to run for 98 days before
blowing up), which I interpret as CFL problems when velocities become
too large. I did not check where this happens, but I had hoped to be
able to run with a longer time step. Oh well.
So the take home message: define ISOTROPIC_COS_SCALING in
CPP_OPTIONS.h (as was pointed out in the thread in Dec2003), do not
use COSMETH_III with ISOTROPIC_COS_SCALING, which does not appear to
PS. there remains a little bit of noise in the w-velocities near
topography, which I choose to neglect.
On Apr 3, 2006, at 6:07 PM, Martin Losch wrote:
> after trying out many things, I may have found a solution to the
> noise problem. In
> CPP_OPTIONS.h I had to set
> #define ISOTROPIC_COS_SCALING
> #undef COSMETH_III
> 1. setting it in GAD_OPTIONS.h does not apply to the momentum
> equations (viscosity terms),
> 2. the COSMETH_III does not seem to work with isotropic scaling,
> maybe it is not meant to work with it, but anyhow, if you turn on
> COSMETH_III, the scaling is no longer isotropic, which causes the
> stripes that I observed in my solutions.
> In GAD_OPTIONS.h I commented out the line that says #undef
> ISOTROPIC_COS_SCALING, so that the isotropic scaling also applies
> to the tracer fields (diffusivity), but I left the COSMETH_III,
> because that seems to be correct in this context (although
> unsetting it here would probably now change things too much).
> Now I can turn off harmonic friction and use a relatively low
> viscosity/diffusivity with cosPower=4. (in data).
> Some of these aspects are already discussed in a thread in 2003,
> here's the end of the thread:
> So Nicolas, maybe this solves your problem as well. I still have to
> tune my friction parameters because things are still blowing up,
> but I do not see this standing noise pattern (so far).
> On Mar 30, 2006, at 3:30 PM, Martin Losch wrote:
>> I seem to have a problem with a 1/6 by 1/6*cos(phi) run with open
>> boundaries. The domain is the Drake Passage. A plot of bathymetry
>> and velocities can be found in
>> Whatever friction parameters I have tried (viscAh=1e0 to 2e1 and
>> viscA4=1e8 to 4e10, and similar for diffusivities, I also tried
>> the Leith/Smagorinski variants), I seem to get noise in the north
>> western part of the domain. What worries me is, that
>> 1. The noise seems to propagate (compare day 149 to day 214 in the
>> bottom panels of the figure)
>> 2. The noise seems to be mainly in the x-direction
>> I use mom_fluxform. For mom_vecinv the problem is there, too.
>> I use USE_ISOTROPIC_SCALING (for viscosities because my y-grid
>> varies with y) and do not use COSINEMETH_III (although that
>> probably doesn't make much of a difference). When I turn off
>> USE_ISOTROPIC_SCALING, the noise is still there, but the x-
>> alignment is slightly less obvious (although very much present).
>> If the noise were deltaX in both directions, I would be concerned
>> about my friction parameters. Here I suspect a problem in the
>> viscosity implementation, but I cannot see how and were.
>> There is some noise that is produced by the open boundaries, but
>> that usually goes away. I think that the generation of the noise
>> is connected to the topography around the tip of South America
>> I wonder if anyone has seen something like this before. What do
>> you think?
>> MITgcm-support mailing list
>> MITgcm-support at mitgcm.org
> MITgcm-support mailing list
> MITgcm-support at mitgcm.org
More information about the MITgcm-support