[MITgcm-support] pressure from MITgcm

[Sergey Vinogradov]

Patrick:
You are right, I meant totPhiHyd...
Sergey

Patrick Heimbach wrote:

>Sergey,
>
>your calculation using PH=phiHydC (!)
>p (PH) = rhoConst*PH(k) + g*rhoConst*D(k)
>
>would be missing the part from the surface elevation
>rho0*g*eta
>
>This part is included in the field totPhiHyd,
>but not in phiHydC (which is what you mentioned).
>If that's the case, you would be missing all
>the Eta variability which would explain the difference.
>But maybe you meant totPhiHyd?
>
>For details, see S/R diags_phi_hyd.F
>in model/src/
>
>-Patrick
>
>  
>