[MITgcm-support] Re: single-layer configuration problem update
Patrick Heimbach
heimbach at MIT.EDU
Tue Aug 30 10:59:15 EDT 2005
Sergey,
several things:
1. I thought you were using the SINGLE_LAYER_MODE flag(?)
2. The std. output has NAN's in cg2d after a few timesteps,
but you're saying the model doesn't explode.
Can you clarify?
3. The alternative, simplere forcing would be via
S/R external_fields_load.F
and not using exf (i.e. remove 'exf' from packages.conf)
An example is in verification/global_ocean.90x40x15/code/
-Patrick
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mitgcm-support-bounces at mitgcm.org
> [mailto:mitgcm-support-bounces at mitgcm.org] On Behalf Of
> Sergey Vinogradov
> Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 10:50 AM
> To: mitgcm-support at mitgcm.org
> Cc: Rui Ponte
> Subject: Re: [MITgcm-support] Re: single-layer
> configuration problem update
>
>
> Martin:
> I don't know of any other way than EXF to introduce the
> variable forcing
> into the mitgcm. The resulting field is not exploding
> though, it stays
> equal to i.c.
> Anyway, SINGLE_LAYER_MODE is probably what I was looking for in a
> context of my experiments.
> Thank you,
> Sergey
>
> Martin Losch wrote:
>
> > Sergey,
> > that's really puzzling. Have you tried the same thing without the
> > EXF-package? (I have had unexpected behavior with this
> package before).
> >
> > However, if --- as you suspect --- no forcing fields
> introduced by EXF
> > is not "felt" by the model, then it wouldn't explode, but
> would just
> > keep quiet without moving at all. So I think, that on the
> contrary,
> > the model feels too much of the forcing; or something completely
> > different is going on.
> >
> > I can't remember your configuration, and obviously, I am
> too stupid to
> > search the MITgcm-support email list effectively so I
> didn't find your
> > previous emails, but were you using the CPP-flag
> SINGLE_LAYER_MODE
> > (kicks out most of thermodynamics)? However, even if you
> were using
> > it, I don't see where it should interfere with the EXF package.
> >
> > Martin
> >
> > On Aug 30, 2005, at 3:49 PM, Sergey Vinogradov wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I just want to update you on my quest in solving the
> problem with
> >> single-layer run under dynamic forcing (and maybe get
> some useful
> >> feedback from you).
> >>
> >> The issue was erroneous computation of ocean dynamics
> (sea-level,
> >> bottom pressure) in a single layer configuration with a
> use of EXF
> >> package interface for the time-varying atm. pressure loading.
> >>
> >> Appearently, it is not a problem of just pressure
> loading. It is far
> >> more general problem, as I tried similar experiment with
> wind stress.
> >> It looks like any forcing that is introduced through EXF
> in one-layer
> >> run, is not "felt" by the model.
> >>
> >> Below is the exerpt from the model output with one
> layer under wind
> >> stress at the beginning of forward integration where you
> can see the
> >> error accumulating in cg solver with each step. Similar
> run with 23
> >> layers computes reasonable fields.
> >>
> >> I'd appreciate any suggestions/comments/tips very much!
> >> Regards,
> >> Sergey
> >>
> >> (PID.TID 0000.0001) //
> >> =======================================================
> >> (PID.TID 0000.0001) // End MONITOR dynamic field statistics
> >> (PID.TID 0000.0001) //
> >> =======================================================
> >> (PID.TID 0000.0001) MDSREADFIELD: opening global file:
> >> /anvil/scratch/day07/svv/forcing/NCEP_R6_ustr_1999
> >> (PID.TID 0000.0001) MDSREADFIELD: opening global file:
> >> /anvil/scratch/day07/svv/forcing/NCEP_R6_ustr_1999
> >> cg2d: Sum(rhs),rhsMax = 5.83105612406154E-15
> 2.52789606828280E+01
> >> cg2d: Sum(rhs),rhsMax = 4.66381008031730E-09
> 2.03846096766287E+01
> >> cg2d: Sum(rhs),rhsMax = -7.72491057666330E-11
> 1.63318316358843E+02
> >> cg2d: Sum(rhs),rhsMax = 7.82384650122037E-10
> 3.94671184216402E+02
> >> cg2d: Sum(rhs),rhsMax = 1.84482164570718E-10
> 1.39786242903642E+03
> >> cg2d: Sum(rhs),rhsMax = -3.86795120889058E-10
> 5.51987500042437E+03
> >> cg2d: Sum(rhs),rhsMax = 5.60930842031203E-10
> 2.96468380272229E+04
> >> cg2d: Sum(rhs),rhsMax = -4.60258786649532E-11
> 1.03144921478204E+06
> >> cg2d: Sum(rhs),rhsMax = 1.93486835808804E-12
> 3.16417950241384E+08
> >> cg2d: Sum(rhs),rhsMax = -2.47236726757771E-12
> 2.35353664301718E+13
> >> cg2d: Sum(rhs),rhsMax = -3.50420466366502E-16
> 2.44341352738558E+23
> >> cg2d: Sum(rhs),rhsMax = -2.42051059455915E-16
> 1.68257839407874E+43
> >> cg2d: Sum(rhs),rhsMax = -2.02970152146811E-16
> 1.42078931888867E+83
> >> cg2d: Sum(rhs),rhsMax = -4.29685153894816E-16
> 9.27740314802081+162
> >> cg2d: Sum(rhs),rhsMax = NAN
> INF
> >> cg2d: Sum(rhs),rhsMax = NAN
> 0.00000000000000E+00
> >> cg2d: Sum(rhs),rhsMax = NAN
> 0.00000000000000E+00
> >> cg2d: Sum(rhs),rhsMax = NAN
> 0.00000000000000E+00
> >> (PID.TID 0000.0001) MDSREADFIELD: opening global file:
> >> /anvil/scratch/day07/svv/forcing/NCEP_R6_ustr_1999
> >> cg2d: Sum(rhs),rhsMax = NAN
> 0.00000000000000E+00
> >> cg2d: Sum(rhs),rhsMax = NAN
> 0.00000000000000E+00
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > MITgcm-support mailing list
> > MITgcm-support at mitgcm.org
> > http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-support
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> MITgcm-support mailing list
> MITgcm-support at mitgcm.org
> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-support
>
More information about the MITgcm-support
mailing list