[MITgcm-support] CVS problem

[Chris Hill]

I think this is probably Ed futzing with DNS - anyhow somebody may have
broken something I think? pserver port not allowed on "mitgcm.org"
maybe?
TS - this is just FYI, unless you guys busted it!

Chris

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel Lea [mailto:daniel.lea at jhuapl.edu] 
> Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 12:31 PM
> To: Chris Hill
> Subject: Account on cg01. What next?
> 
> 
> 
> Hi Chris,
> 
> I've got myself an account on cg01. What next?
> 
> I've tried to use CVS to download the ecco version of the 
> MITgcm on cg01. Doesn't work.
> 
> [dlea at cg01 dlea]$ cvs login
> Logging in to :pserver:cvsanon at mitgcm.org:2401/u/u0/gcmpack
> CVS password:
> cvs [login aborted]: connect to mitgcm.org(18.24.3.31):2401 
> failed: Connection refused
> 
> I used the password cvsanon.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Dan
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Chris Hill wrote:
> 
> > Hi Dan,
> >
> >  Go here
> >
> > http://mitgcm.org/projects/MITGCM_CLUSTER/get_an_account.htm
> >
> >  and they will create an account - if you can get something 
> compiled 
> > and running there we can then try some newer machines too.
> >
> > Chris
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Daniel Lea [mailto:daniel.lea at jhuapl.edu]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 11:56 AM
> > > To: Chris Hill
> > > Cc: Tom Haine
> > > Subject: Temporary cluster account
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi Chris,
> > >
> > > I was talking to Tom Haine yesterday about him running the MITgcm 
> > > while he is out at sea in Irminger Sea in a weeks time. 
> My job would 
> > > be to supply initial conditions to him for that run (and also 
> > > perhaps do some almost real-time data assimilation).
> > >
> > > I have already developed the configuration for the 
> Irminger Sea and 
> > > so on, but am lacking in computer time to do an integration up to 
> > > say July 2003.
> > >
> > > I think Tom may have raised this with you... But, I was 
> wondering if 
> > > you had any clusters available which I could get an account on 
> > > temporarily. The domain is 156x144 (at 9km
> > > resolution) so I would probably need only 4 fast CPUs.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > Dan
> > >
> > >
> >
>