[Mitgcm-support] Re: I try to follow the procedure

[mitgcm-support at dev.mitgcm.org]

Clear answer:
So that it will be more difficult for specific people to say
"It doesn't work!" while nobody knows, what exactly it is
that doesn't work (e.g. a screwed-up configuration).

I go with Jean-Michel.

Chris Hill wrote:
> 
> Why do we need check_config in release1?
> Can't it be part of release2?
> I know I am a trouble maker!
> 
> Chris
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jean-Michel Campin [mailto:jmc at gulf.mit.edu]
> Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 9:31 AM
> To: support at mitgcm.org
> Subject: I try to follow the procedure
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I am going to check-in a new routine (config_check) that has to be in
> release1-beta2.
> will create tag chkpt44a_pre in few minutes, then check-in
> a non up-to-date version of this routine, create tag chkpt44a_post,
> and update the config_check routine.
> The reason : since OBC+NLFS will not be in release1-beta2, I need
> a different version of config_check in main-branch and release branch.
> 
> estimated time : < 30 mn.
> 
> See you.
> 
> Jean-Michel

-- 
_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/

Patrick Heimbach ........................ FON: +1/617/253-5259
Massachusetts Institute of Technology ... FAX: +1/617/253-4464 
EAPS, Room 54-1518 ...........................................
77 Massachusetts Avenue .............. mailto:heimbach at mit.edu
Cambridge MA 02139, U.S.A. ..... http://www.mit.edu/~heimbach/