[Mitgcm-support] Re: numbers

mitgcm-support at dev.mitgcm.org mitgcm-support at dev.mitgcm.org
Wed Jul 9 15:41:02 EDT 2003


Yes on the EXCH_*_RL->RS. Doesn't change numbers anywhere.

Those numbers are definately reproducable: I just checked
out on soyinka and it gets the right numbers to the last digit.

Did you remember to patch dynamics.F?

A.
Chris Hill wrote:
> 
> A.,
> 
> On soyinka I went back through restoring ini_depths.F
> and then ini_masks_etc.F. Didn't get the results
> in results/output.txt yet! They change each time though!!
> Any thoughts? Going to do a benign ini_depths.F fix
> for what I need, since its not meant to change numbers.
> 
> C.
> 
> Chris Hill wrote:
> >
> > A.,
> >
> > Didn't manage to get the numbers with the plain checkout.
> > Did get comparable numbers (12 digitis) on soyinka and xolas and
> > identical to 14 digitis on xolas and on xolas + 6-threading.
> >
> > But isn't the code actually wrong without
> > the UV exchange of hFacW/hFacS fix? Not sure
> > why since they are symmetric in this config. However, that fix
> > changes the numbers and gets rid of blow up at 720 secs.
> > Think it should be an _RS exchange, but I am
> > running #define REAL4_IS_SLOW at the mom.
> >
> > Just trying a run on soyinka with the old ini_depths
> > and _exch_r4 stuff to see if that blows too.
> > If it works I can change ini_depths in a way
> > that definitely has no impact. Bit confused though,
> > can't see how the new form differs from the old -
> > do you?
> >
> > Chris



More information about the MITgcm-support mailing list