[Mitgcm-support] RE: lab-sea high sensitivity

[mitgcm-support at dev.mitgcm.org]

dimitris,

 is it too hard to just check in the _d's now? if you can do that
we don't have to have the messiness persist. 

 btw - the lab sea code always used to have issues with 
       open boudaries and undefined overlap regions. not sure
       whether anyone ever fixed that.

chris


-----Original Message-----
From: Dimitris Menemenlis [mailto:menemenlis at jpl.nasa.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 3:14 AM
To: Jean-Michel Campin
Cc: support at mitgcm.org
Subject: lab-sea high sensitivity



Jean-Michel, you are right about the _d's.
By adding a few _d's to growth.F and to dynsolver.F, the
discrepancy between the g77 and SGI lab_sea tests is further reduced to:

   Y Y Y Y  8 10  9 12 10  9 11 13 10  9  8  8  9  8  9  8  9 FAIL  lab_sea

For comparison, the release1_p8 discrepancy is:

   Y Y Y Y  5  5  7  7  7  8 10  9  6  6  6  6  7  5  7  5  7 FAIL  lab_sea

and the discrepancy after removing the "-r8" SGI f77 flag is:

   Y Y Y Y  7  9  7  9  8  8 10 11  8  8  7  7  8  7  7  7  8 FAIL  lab_sea

I'll make sure to include _d's in next release of sea-ice package.

D.

-- 
Dimitris Menemenlis                      menemenlis at jpl.nasa.gov
Jet Propulsion Lab, MS 300-323           tel: 818-354-1656
4800 Oak Grove Dr, Pasadena CA 91109     fax: 818-393-6720