[Mitgcm-support] Re: ecco-branch question?

[mitgcm-support at dev.mitgcm.org]

No. The verification experiments for the sea ice adjoint
are currently based on natl_box_adjoint and therefore
in the ecco-branch.
However, the seaice code in the main branch is only
a few weeks behind. So it's more of a "2-way thing".
Dimitris actually used to commit changes to both branches
immediately.

-p.

Chris Hill wrote:
> Clicking on the revision graph it looks like there are changes on
> "ecco-branch" that sound like they should be on the main branch e.g.
> 
> untagged
> o Modifications to pkg/seaice, verification/lab_sea, and
>   verification/natl_box_adjoint for testing sea-ice adjoint code.
> 
> Is this normal? Isn't it supposed to work the other way i.e. these
> changes initially go in the main branch and then get merged into the
> ecco branch? Or is there a two way thing going on. 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Chris
> 


-- 
_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
Patrick Heimbach ............................. MIT
FON: +1/617/253-5259 .......... EAPS, Room 54-1518
FAX: +1/617/253-4464 ..... 77 Massachusetts Avenue
mailto:heimbach at mit.edu ....... Cambridge MA 02139
http://www.mit.edu/~heimbach/ ................ USA