[Mitgcm-support] Re: KPP version

[mitgcm-support at dev.mitgcm.org]

"Dimitris Menemenlis

> >> The two "images" of kpp are the same. We're trying out the
> >> use of links so that we can have different structured distributions
> >> but with same files inside.
>
> so which one is the master, which one the slave?
> or does it matter?

Update one and the other is updated automatically.

An example might make it clearer:

  mitcvs co -d test1 packages/kpp
  mitcvs co -d test2 models/MITgcmUV/pkg/kpp

  cd test1
  vi kpp_do_diags.F
  cvs commit

  cd ../test2
  cvs update
  P kpp_do_diags.F

Cool huh?

Don't try it. We don't want arbitrary junk cluttering our rep.
:-)

A.