[Mitgcm-support] Re: numbers

[mitgcm-support at dev.mitgcm.org]

I presume our messages crossed on the wire? Check-out, patch and run.

> A.,
> 
> Latest news - still puzzled! Reverted ini_depths.F and
> then tried either the later form of
> ini_mask ( UV_CUBE_EXCH(hFacW,HfacS,...) ) or the
> earlier form ( _R4_EXCH(hFacw); _EXCH_R4(hFacS) ).
> Neither gives numbers in results/ouput.txt.
> Note - with earlier form ( with _R4_EXCH() ) of
> ini_masks code gives NaN with 720s timestep.
> This is true of ini_depths.F hacked by cnh or
> ini_depths.F prior to cnh mischief.
> 
> Chris