[MITgcm-support] adjoint example

[BIN ZHAO]

Thanks for the information.
As you said,switching off GM/Redi works.

Does adjoint work with KPP scheme?
Bin

----- Original Message -----
From: Patrick Heimbach <heimbach at MIT.EDU>
Date: Tuesday, December 2, 2003 9:11 am
Subject: Re: [MITgcm-support] adjoint example

> For starters, switch off GM/Redi, i.e. in data.pkg set
> useGMRedi=.FALSE.
> 
> The adjoint of this scheme is tricky,
> but to get you started you should be fine without it.
> 
> -Patrick
> 
> 
> 
> BIN ZHAO wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >   I just begin working on the adjoint of the MITgcm.
> >   As a first step, I tried the example in 
> c51/verification/global_ocean.90x40x15.>   I compiled and ran the 
> adjoint model for a short period of time(7 days) with only 
> ALLOW_COST_ATLANTIC_HEAT, and I got reasonal sensitivities. But 
> when I ran it for 1 year, the sensitivity values just went 
> crazy(10^54?). Can anyone tell me what is wrong here?
> > Thanks,
> > Bin Zhao
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > MITgcm-support mailing list
> > MITgcm-support at mitgcm.org
> > http://dev.mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-support
> 
> 
> -- 
> Patrick Heimbach ........................... M.I.T
> FON: +1/617/253-5259 .......... EAPS, Room 54-1518
> FAX: +1/617/253-4464 ..... 77 Massachusetts Avenue
> heimbach at mit.edu ....... Cambridge MA 02139
> http://www.mit.edu/~heimbach/ .............. U.S.A
> 
> _______________________________________________
> MITgcm-support mailing list
> MITgcm-support at mitgcm.org
> http://dev.mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-support
>