[MITgcm-devel] major recomputations with move of ecco_phys call

Matthew Mazloff mmazloff at ucsd.edu
Thu Mar 2 13:21:37 EST 2017


Hi Gael

I haven’t checked the verification experiments. Sorry for the miscommunication -- I was asking if you had. Do any of the testers or your setup show major recomputations? 

Matt


> On Mar 2, 2017, at 10:14 AM, gael forget <gforget at mit.edu> wrote:
> 
> Hi Matt, what verification experiment shows this recomputation? Gael
> 
> 
> On Mar 1, 2017, at 2:48 PM, Matthew Mazloff <mmazloff at ucsd.edu <mailto:mmazloff at ucsd.edu>> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Gael
>> 
>> I just updated to the latest code from checkpoint66c and am getting major recomputations from this modification:
>> 
>> "move call to ecco_phys to end of time step; this may induce minor cost function changes by shifting time averages by one time step for some variables; this revision resulted in changed adjoint results in MITgcm_contrib/verification_other/global_oce_cs32”
>> 
>> The recomputations go away when I move the call back from 
>> 	forward_step.F
>> to
>> 	do_oceanic_phys.F
>> 
>> 
>> Can you please check if you also get major recomputations for the test runs with this modification or if this is something specific to my setup. 
>> 
>> Thanks
>> Matt
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> MITgcm-devel mailing list
>> MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org <mailto:MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org>
>> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel
> 
> _______________________________________________
> MITgcm-devel mailing list
> MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mitgcm.org/pipermail/mitgcm-devel/attachments/20170302/6e11cfee/attachment.htm>


More information about the MITgcm-devel mailing list