[MITgcm-devel] mnc units

[Patrick Heimbach]

No objection here either.
p.

> On Jun 1, 2017, at 1:38 PM, Jean-Michel Campin <jmc at mit.edu> wrote:
> 
> Hi Martin,
> 
> I don't have any objection for this modification (seems nicer without
> the comma).
> 
> Cheers,
> Jean-Michel
> 
> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 11:58:35AM +0200, Martin Losch wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> is there a good reason why the time units (when useCal = .TRUE.) contain a comma (???,???) that is not part of the 
>> convention of ???udunits????
>> 
>> This is not recognized by udunits:
>> T:units = "seconds since 0000-01-01, 00:00:00??? ;
>> but this is:
>> T:units = "seconds since 0000-01-01 00:00:00" ;
>> 
>> If there are no objections, I would like to change this little detail.
>> 
>> Martin
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> MITgcm-devel mailing list
>> MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
>> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel
> 
> _______________________________________________
> MITgcm-devel mailing list
> MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 1845 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mitgcm.org/pipermail/mitgcm-devel/attachments/20170601/0a24aef5/attachment.p7s>