[MITgcm-devel] [MITgcm-cvs] MITgcm/pkg/streamice CVS Commit

Tue Apr 12 09:23:21 EDT 2016

Hi Dan,

I didn't see any answer yet.
Are you receiving msg posted to mitgcm-devel ?

Cheers,
Jean-Michel

On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 08:48:32PM -0400, Jean-Michel Campin wrote:
> Hi Dan,
> 
> Regarding the confusion, it's my fault, I quoted the g77 output instead of
> the gfortran output !
> 
> However, I did not check last time but the OpenAD output has changes too:
> from March 19:
> Y Y Y Y 16>10<16 FAIL  halfpipe_streamice
> and before your changes (e.g., March 18):
> Y Y Y Y 16>16<16 pass  halfpipe_streamice
> Could you check this one and update output_oadm.txt if you think these
> changes are expected ?
> 
> And coming back to TAF adm, it's not clear if results did change or not
> since the output_adm.txt had not been updated (after changes made at the end
> of June 2015 or in July 2015) with only 10 digits agreement since that time:
> Y Y Y Y 12>10< 5 FAIL  halfpipe_streamice  (e=0, w=8)
> Should I update this output_adm.txt (agreement between fwd grad and AD grad
> are not significantly different) ? 
> 
> Cheers,
> Jean-Michel
> 
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 07:47:46AM +0000, Daniel Goldberg wrote:
> > Hi J-M --
> > 
> > Sorry I misunderstood, I thought new changes had caused the
> > halfpipe_streamice taf expt to not compile any more. If the inaccuracy
> > reflects earlier changes this makes sense. That is fine then if you are
> > able to compile with TAF now; I do not have any license I can use. (At some
> > point I might make a change that will lead to recomputation loops and
> > too-long run times and will not be able to debug -- this is why i suggested
> > not to run it anymore...)
> > 
> > On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 7:00 AM, Jean-Michel Campin <jmc at mit.edu> wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi Dan,
> > >
> > > I've just checked and the time it take to run the AD-TAF experiment has
> > > not increased significantly. So we ccould continue to run it everyday.
> > > But it would be good to update the output_adm.txt if we think that
> > > it reflect past changes in the code (I don't remember exactly when
> > > the results did change and there was some back and forth uodate at the
> > > time).
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Jean-Michel
> > >
> > > On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 07:06:12PM +0000, Daniel Goldberg wrote:
> > > > hi j-m
> > > >
> > > > i was afraid of this, not having any access to taf anymore makes it very
> > > > difficult to maintain the output_results or check whether a change
> > > "breaks"
> > > > the experiment. i was confident that it would not because my changes do
> > > not
> > > > break OpenAD -- but I don't know what the issue is with TAF. do we want
> > > to
> > > > maybe just stop running the TAF experiment?
> > > >
> > > > I'll look into the other issue with jim.
> > > >
> > > > thanks
> > > > dan
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 6:20 PM, Jean-Michel Campin <jmc at mit.edu> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Dan and Jim,
> > > > >
> > > > > It seems that these changes have increased the number of TAF
> > > recomputation
> > > > > warning:
> > > > > previously:
> > > > > > Y Y N N .. .. .. N/O   halfpipe_streamice  (e=0, w=8)
> > > > > and now:
> > > > > < Y Y N N .. .. .. N/O   halfpipe_streamice  (e=0, w=10)
> > > > > Note that this experiment has been failing (only 10 matching digits)
> > > > > for a long time (I remember sending an email at that time).
> > > > >
> > > > > Also, experiment shelfice_remeshing is now broken (not compile
> > > anymore).
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > Jean-Michel
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 03:18:29PM -0400, Daniel N. Goldberg, 54-1423,
> > > > > 6172532977,  wrote:
> > > > > > Update of /u/gcmpack/MITgcm/pkg/streamice
> > > > > > In directory forge:/tmp/cvs-serv5616
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Modified Files:
> > > > > >       STREAMICE.h streamice_get_fp_err_oad.F
> > > > > >       streamice_get_vel_fp_err.F streamice_get_vel_resid_err.F
> > > > > >       streamice_get_vel_resid_err_oad.F streamice_readparms.F
> > > > > > Log Message:
> > > > > > allow for differing error norms in nonlinear iteration
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > MITgcm-cvs mailing list
> > > > > > MITgcm-cvs at mitgcm.org
> > > > > > http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-cvs
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > MITgcm-devel mailing list
> > > > > MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
> > > > > http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > Daniel Goldberg, PhD
> > > > Lecturer in Glaciology
> > > > School of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh
> > > > Geography Building, Drummond Street, Edinburgh EH8 9XP
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > em: D <dgoldber at mit.edu>an.Goldberg at ed.ac.uk
> > > > web: http://ocean.mit.edu/~dgoldberg
> > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > MITgcm-devel mailing list
> > > > MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
> > > > http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > MITgcm-devel mailing list
> > > MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
> > > http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > 
> > Daniel Goldberg, PhD
> > Lecturer in Glaciology
> > School of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh
> > Geography Building, Drummond Street, Edinburgh EH8 9XP
> > 
> > 
> > em: D <dgoldber at mit.edu>an.Goldberg at ed.ac.uk
> > web: http://ocean.mit.edu/~dgoldberg
> 
> > _______________________________________________
> > MITgcm-devel mailing list
> > MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
> > http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> MITgcm-devel mailing list
> MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel