[MITgcm-devel] testing on stan1

[Jean-Michel Campin]

Hi Martin and Patrick,

This Jul 03 genmake2 modification does not seem very robust.
Should we revert to previous version of genmake2 (without OPENAD_DIVA
setting) until we come up with something better ?

also, I am concerned that this new (& undocumented) "-diva" option 
(specific to OPENAD) might be confused with TAF-diva way.

Cheers,
Jean-Michel

On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 10:15:49AM +0200, Martin Losch wrote:
> Hi Jean-Michel,
> 
> I am moving this to the devel list, because the reason for the fail is this error message:
> 
> "Makefile", line 63: make: 1254-055 Dependency line needs colon or double colon operator.
> make: 1254-058 Fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue.
> 
> the corresponding line is this
> 61 # Link editor
> 62 LINK = mpxlf95_r -q64
> 63 export
> 64
> 65 # Defines for CPP
> 
> and on July 03 this line has been added to genmake2 (together with others):
> 2897	 	 export $OPENAD_DIVA
> (see <http://mitgcm.org/viewvc/MITgcm/MITgcm/tools/genmake2?r1=1.271&r2=1.272> for more details)
> OPENAD_DIVA is empty in my case.
> 
> Not clear to me, how to fix this. I didn???t know you could use ???export??? in a Makefile. Is it really needed?
> 
> Martin
> 
> > On 30 Aug 2015, at 19:48, Jean-Michel Campin <jmc at ocean.mit.edu> wrote:
> > 
> > Hi Martin,
> > 
> > There are also some problems with testing on iblade that I should have reported
> > earlier: Since July 04, all the experiments on iblade are failing (to compile ?).
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > Jean-Michel
> > 
> > On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 12:00:22PM -0400, Jean-Michel Campin wrote:
> >> Hi Martin,
> >> 
> >> How are you ?
> >> 
> >> Regarding the testing on stan1, I've noticed that, after one day (Aug 12) with everal fails,
> >> we iare back to normal since AUg 13, except for the (standard) experiment: adjustment.cs-32x32x1
> >> (not the nlfs secondary test which always fails with MPI) which continue to fail.
> >> 
> >> I now have seen 3 - almost identical - testreport output (Aug 13,14 & 15) 
> >> where adjustment.cs-32x32x1 failed (at compilation stage ?) so may be there is
> >> something not cleaned up there ?
> >> 
> >> It's not urgent, but when you have time to take a look at this.
> >> 
> >> Cheers,
> >> Jean-Michel
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> MITgcm-devel mailing list
> MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel