[MITgcm-devel] [MITgcm-cvs] MITgcm/pkg/layers CVS Commit
Jean-Michel Campin
jmc at ocean.mit.edu
Wed Jun 3 14:50:57 EDT 2015
Hi Ryan,
yes, LaTz & LaSz or LaTv & LaSv, both are OK with me.
But, correct me if I am wrong, seems that only LaTz has been changed
and not yet LaSr -> LaSz.
And when you find time, would be good to put few lines of description
in doc/tag-index about the changes you made.
This is true also for Gael's changes in pkg/ptracers
Cheers,
Jean-Michel
On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 01:58:02PM -0400, Ryan Abernathey wrote:
> That's very close to what I just did. I renamed LaTr & LaSr to LaTz & LaSz.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Jean-Michel Campin <jmc at ocean.mit.edu>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Ryan,
> >
> > Sorry, I missed the piece of code (+ comments) in layers_diagnostics_init.F
> > where you explain why you did change this diagnostics name.
> > Regarding the white space in the middle, I was not right neither (but this
> > might depend on compiler); with gfortran, the 2 white spaces are at the
> > beginning, which is not great neither.
> >
> > I have a suggestion: if we rename LaTr & LaSr to LaTv and LaSv
> > (v for vertical in contrast to h for horizontal), would this work ?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Jean-Michel
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 12:58:02PM -0400, Ryan Abernathey wrote:
> > > Jean Michel,
> > >
> > > Please accept my sincere apologies for causing these problems.
> > >
> > > I changed the name of LaTr#RHO to La#RHO because, in my new diagnostics
> > for
> > > LAYERS_THERMODYNAMICS, I introduced the name LaTr#RHO completely
> > > independently and unaware of your new diagnostic with the same new. (This
> > > was a consequence of allowing my branch to become out of sync with the
> > main
> > > branch while I was developing it.)
> > >
> > > My naming choice was part of a larger scheme, including the following
> > > diagnostics
> > > LaTs: Layer THETA transformation from surf. forc.
> > > LaTh: Layer THETA transformation from horiz. diff.
> > > LaTr: Layer THETA transformation from vert. diff.
> > > LaSs: Layer SALT transformation from surf. forc.
> > > LaSh: Layer SALT transformation from horiz. diff.
> > > LaSr: Layer SALT transformation from vert. diff.
> > >
> > > As you requested, I will restore the old name of LaTr#RHO for the
> > potential
> > > density field. However, I will have to change the name of my new
> > > diagnostics to allow this. As for the whitespace, that was just a
> > mistake.
> > >
> > > As for the broken cfc_example, I did indeed check carefully it before
> > > checking in my code. I am looking again now to see what went wrong.
> > >
> > > I am working on this now and will check in a fixed version of the code
> > > asap, hopefully within an hour or two.
> > >
> > > I always manage to screw something up whenever I try to check code in...
> > >
> > > -R
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Jean-Michel Campin <jmc at ocean.mit.edu>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Ryan,
> > > >
> > > > I have a problem with renaming diagnostic "LaTr#RHO" to "La #RHO" in
> > > > layers_calc.F:
> > > > a) it's not great to have white space within diagnostics name ;
> > > > b) this name change is not implemented in layers_diagnostics_init.F
> > (this
> > > > diagnostics
> > > > is currently broken);
> > > > c) I added this diagnostics few weeks ago ; I don't know why you want
> > > > to change it but we can discuss this ; and this was not in the set of
> > > > changes you sent me yesterday.
> > > > I would like to put back the previous diagnostics name (LaTr#RHO).
> > > >
> > > > And there a a second problem:
> > > > the forward testreport fail to compile experiments exp4 & cfc_example.
> > > > (I did check the Adjoint testreport yesterday but not the forward
> > which I
> > > > thought
> > > > was OK according to your earlier email).
> > > > Could you fix this problem today ?
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Jean-Michel
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 09:39:22AM -0400, Ryan Abernathey wrote:
> > > > > Update of /u/gcmpack/MITgcm/pkg/layers
> > > > > In directory forge:/tmp/cvs-serv14197/pkg/layers
> > > > >
> > > > > Modified Files:
> > > > > LAYERS.h layers_calc.F layers_diagnostics_init.F
> > > > > layers_fluxcalc.F layers_init_fixed.F layers_init_varia.F
> > > > > layers_save.F layers_thermodynamics.F
> > > > > Log Message:
> > > > > Fixed bug in layers_fluxcalc.F regarding incorrect interpolation with
> > > > > partial cells.
> > > > > Enhanced the LAYERS_THERMODYNAMICS diagnostic options.
> > > > > Renamed LaTr... diagnostic to La...
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > MITgcm-cvs mailing list
> > > > > MITgcm-cvs at mitgcm.org
> > > > > http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-cvs
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > MITgcm-devel mailing list
> > > > MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
> > > > http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel
> > > >
> >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > MITgcm-devel mailing list
> > > MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
> > > http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > MITgcm-devel mailing list
> > MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
> > http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel
> >
> _______________________________________________
> MITgcm-devel mailing list
> MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel
More information about the MITgcm-devel
mailing list