[MITgcm-devel] stripes in adjoint along tile edges

[Dimitris Menemenlis]

Seems sufficient.  Not an expert.
Hopefully JM and/or Patrick will chime in.

> On Nov 20, 2014, at 7:48 AM, Martin Losch <Martin.Losch at awi.de> wrote:
> 
> The overlap is 4 (as in MITgcm_contrib/arctic/cs_36km) and I am not using cubed sphere exchanges (in fact, not even exch2). 3 should be enough for advection schemes 30 or 33, shouldn’t it?
> What do you suggest to use as overlap? 6?
> 
> M.