[MITgcm-devel] max seaice thickness statement
Jean-Michel Campin
jmc at ocean.mit.edu
Sun Feb 2 22:25:37 EST 2014
Hi,
Anthony is doing LGM type of simulations with pkg/seaice, and send me the
message below.
In my answer, I added this:
> Regarding the option to cap the seaice thickness, it was there in older
> version of pkg/seaice (prior to Dec i27, 2012, CPP-option "SEAICE_CAP_HEFF"
> and using run-time parameter "MAX_HEFF") but this has been removed.
> Will ask arround if there is a simple way to put it back.
> I think that this option exist within pkg/thsice (run-time parameter "hiMax")
> but you might not be willing to switch to a different thermodynamics
> (I would understand).
So my question is: Is there is a simple way to put back the "SEAICE_CAP_HEFF" code/hack ?
Cheers,
Jean-Michel
On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 10:59:30AM -0500, Anthony Coletti wrote:
> HI Jean-Michel,
>
> My name is Anthony. We met at the ECCO meeting a few weeks ago. I am
> Alan Condron's student. You told me to send you an email without going
> through the list, so here I am!
>
> Anywho,
>
> I wanted to know what the new updated sea-ice thickness statement is in
> regards to capping my seaice from growing any bigger. I was using
> MAX_HEFF in my data.seaice file however, it gave me an error saying that
> the statement has been "retired"
>
> The reason I want to cap my seaice is because I was getting the infamous
> calc_r_star error where r*star < hFacmin. The model seems to just blow
> up. To alleviate this issue, I increase hFacMin = 1., . This seemed to
> work for a few hundred years of integration but it eventually crashed
> again with a similar error. This time, it was complaining about my
> hFacInf. So, I decided to tweak hFacInf from hFacInf = 0.2, to hFacInf =
> 0.01, which may be too small?? So far, it has gone through a few decades
> of integration without a crash, but I am not sure if messing around with
> hFac will have devastating consequences later.
>
> I figured that if I cap my seaice growth, I wouldn't have a problem with
> the free surface lowering down to the bathymetry (which seems to be the
> culprit with the calc_r_star error. Do you have any suggestions for these
> errors as I try to equilibrate my integration? Will capping the seaice
> help with this error?
>
> Thank you for your time!
>
> Anthony
> --
> Anthony J. Coletti
> Climate System Research Center
> Department of Geosciences
> University of Massachusetts-Amherst
> paleoclimate.org
> ajcolett at geo.umass.edu
> http://blogs.umass.edu/ajcolett/
>
----- End forwarded message -----
More information about the MITgcm-devel
mailing list