[MITgcm-devel] something to report
Manfredi Manizza
mmanizza at ocean.mit.edu
Mon Oct 21 15:41:35 EDT 2013
Jean-Michel,
Just to clarify, is the nc file that is a bit larger
than the file in binray format whihc I think is the default..
I tried to impelment your sugggestion,
It blows the model up becuase it looks for a 6th tile
that is not there given that the domain is set for 5 tiles only, see
below from log file.
I will try to see if I use the grid nc files generated by the run what
happens to the matlab program that converts the output into lat/lon.
It may work, not sure yet...
forrtl: severe (29): file not found, unit 9, file
/nobackupp8/mmanizza/llc90/run_nocost/tile006.mitgrid
Image PC Routine Line Source
libintlc.so.5 00002AAAAC49CF6A Unknown Unknown
Unknown
libintlc.so.5 00002AAAAC49BAE5 Unknown Unknown
Unknown
libifcore.so.5 00002AAAAB62DE12 Unknown Unknown
Unknown
libifcore.so.5 00002AAAAB5A35CB Unknown Unknown
Unknown
libifcore.so.5 00002AAAAB5A2CDE Unknown Unknown
Unknown
libifcore.so.5 00002AAAAB5C0848 Unknown Unknown
Unknown
mitgcmuv 00000000005A2B00 mds_facef_read_rs 1081
mdsio_facef_read.f
mitgcmuv 0000000000739A5C ini_curvilinear_g 3482
ini_curvilinear_grid.f
mitgcmuv 0000000000741804 ini_grid_ 3330
ini_grid.f
mitgcmuv 000000000075D1F1 initialise_fixed_ 1904
initialise_fixed.f
mitgcmuv 00000000007721F2 the_model_main_ 3119
the_model_main.f
mitgcmuv 00000000006DCF82 MAIN__ 4010 main.f
mitgcmuv 0000000000409ABC Unknown Unknown
Unknown
libc.so.6 00002AAAACA1CBC6 Unknown Unknown
Unknown
mitgcmuv 00000000004099B9 Unknown Unknown
Unknown
Manfredi
On Sun, 20 Oct 2013, Jean-Michel Campin wrote:
> Hi Manfredi,
>
> I don't know what is your "data.exch2" parameter file,
> but I assume that you have:
> W2_useE2ioLayOut=T (this is the default)
> and:
> W2_mapIO = 1 (this is not the default, which is -1)
> and with some blank tiles ?
>
> Now, the option "W2_useE2ioLayOut" has not been implemented
> in pkg/mnc, and this could explain that you have different
> size between mnc + rdmnc.m and mdsio + rdmds.m
>
> I think that if you set:
> W2_useE2ioLayOut=F
> the plain binary output file (pkg/mdsio + rdmds.m) should have the
> same size the current output that you get with mnc + rdmnc.m
>
> Cheers,
> Jean-Michel
>
> On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 12:21:41PM -0400, Manfredi Manizza wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am reporting a feture I found comparing the output
>> of the ECCO lat-lon-cap global set-up provided by Patrick to me.
>>
>> The dimensions of the files are different depending on the format.
>> If in netcdf :
>>
>> S =
>>
>> attributes: [1x1 struct]
>> iters_from_file: [12x1 double]
>> si_AREAtave: [90x1082x12 double]
>>
>> If in binary :
>>
>>
>>> more pickup_seaice.0000008772.meta
>> nDims = [ 2 ];
>> dimList = [
>> 90, 1, 90,
>> 1170, 1, 1170
>> ];
>> dataprec = [ 'float64' ];
>> nrecords = [ 6 ];
>> timeStepNumber = [ 8772 ];
>> timeInterval = [ 3.157920000000E+07 ];
>> nFlds = [ 6 ];
>> fldList = {
>> 'siTICE ' 'siAREA ' 'siHEFF ' 'siHSNOW ' 'siUICE ' 'siVICE '
>> };
>>
>>
>> The grid quantities that I have , when loaded, have the dimensions
>> of 90 by 1170.
>>
>> In fact i can use the functions of gcmfaces only using the binary
>> files...
>>
>> I am not sure if there is something I am missing or if
>> there is something wrong in the code. I just felt I needed to
>> send this out.
>>
>> Thanks in advance for your attention.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Manfredi
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> MITgcm-devel mailing list
>> MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
>> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> MITgcm-devel mailing list
> MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel
>
More information about the MITgcm-devel
mailing list