[MITgcm-devel] linux_amd64_ifort+mpi_ice_nas update

[David Ferreira]

I've never tried optimizing seaice_growth.F
Could this be tested with testreport first?
 From memory, the results of the verification exp with seaice are good.
Compilation problem should show up easily.
david



On 10/1/13 9:38 PM, Dimitris Menemenlis wrote:
> Jean-Michel I have not tried.
> Pleiades is inaccessible right now because of shutdown.
> But when it comes back up what would be a good test to run?
> I can give it a try and see what happens but the
> results with O1 or O2 are not expected to be the same as with O0,
> and a possible problem might not manifest itself right away.
>
> David any more info on this?
>
> Dimitris Menemenlis
>
> On Oct 1, 2013, at 1:19 PM, Jean-Michel Campin wrote:
>
>> Hi David and Dimitris,
>>
>> I wonder if it's still necessary to compile seaice_growth.F with -O0.
>> it has been added to the NOOPTFILES list in July 2010.
>> Did someone try recently with -O1 ? and if it works, is it faster
>> than -O0 ?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Jean-Michel
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 05:00:58AM -0400, David Ferreira wrote:
>>> Update of /u/gcmpack/MITgcm/tools/build_options
>>> In directory forge:/tmp/cvs-serv18718
>>>
>>> Modified Files:
>>> 	linux_amd64_ifort+mpi_ice_nas
>>> Log Message:
>>> Updated with a newer compiler (comp-intel/2012.0.032) and mpi library (mpi-sgi/mpt.2.06rp16)
>
> _______________________________________________
> MITgcm-devel mailing list
> MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel