[MITgcm-devel] ITD code in seaice_model

[Torge Martin]

Hi Martin,

no, there's no specific need to have them in the main routine. Feel free to
move the calls into seaice_advdiff and seaice_growth.
Since the model can be run with or without dynamics and/or thermodynamics I
believe it's good to have itd_redist and itd_sum called at the end of both.

Torge


On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 7:57 AM, Martin Losch <Martin.Losch at awi.de> wrote:

> Hi Torge,
>
> does it make sense to move the ITD-related code (calling SEAICE_ITD_REDIST
> and SEAICE_ITD_SUM) out of S/R seaice_model, ie. put into S/R
> seaice_advdiff and S/R seaice_growth? Or in other words, is there a
> specific reason for having them in the main driver routine?
>
> Martin
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> MITgcm-devel mailing list
> MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mitgcm.org/pipermail/mitgcm-devel/attachments/20130531/6285f1fd/attachment.htm>