[MITgcm-devel] linux_amd64_ifort+mpi_ice_nas

[David Ferreira]

Dimitri,
The testreport looks fine.
So I'll update the optfile with the newer mpi-sgi/mpt.2.06a67.

As for the compiler, I suggest not doing anything: comp-intel/2011.2 
(the default) works.
(and I don't have time to look more into the recommanded 
comp-intel/2011.7.256)
but I'll put a comment.
david

On 4/23/13 11:32 AM, Menemenlis, Dimitris (3248) wrote:
> OK.  Thanks.  Let me know if there is problem with testreport result.
>
> I have been using comp-intel/2011.2 for past couple of weeks for Westmere
> and Sandy Bridge and so far as I can tell it has been working fine.
>
> Shall we put in a comment about comp-intel/2011.7.256 and Sandy Bridge
> in the build_option file for time being, until there is more experience with it?
>
> Dimitris Menemenlis
>
> On Apr 23, 2013, at 7:32 AM, David Ferreira wrote:
>
>> Hi Dimitri,
>> I'm going to run a testreport today.  We'll see if your changes make any difference (probably not).
>>
>> As for other options to update, I don't know. I'm running testreport with this:
>> module load comp-intel/2011.2 mpi-sgi/mpt.2.06a67 netcdf/4.0
>> and this works for all nodes.
>>
>> That said, I think that comp-intel/2011.7.256 or higher is recommanded for Sandy bridge nodes, but it does change the results to change the compilers.
>> david
>
> _______________________________________________
> MITgcm-devel mailing list
> MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel