[MITgcm-devel] obcs_seaice_sponge.F

Wed Sep 19 11:31:40 EDT 2012

Jean-Michel, I will wait for your multi-threaded fix before
checking in obcs_seaice_sponge.F

The one-problem with 2-D/3-D rbcs relaxation fields is that they
are impractical when you want to specify high-frequency boundary
conditions for high resolution domains.  The input files would be big.
For example, in Michael's regional 1-km PIG set-up, specifying daily
rbcs over 40 years would require 23Nr-GB input files vs 112Nr-MB
input files for obcs_sponge specification of same information.