[MITgcm-devel] question regarding seaice_solve4temp.F
Jean-Michel Campin
jmc at ocean.mit.edu
Mon Jan 30 13:34:20 EST 2012
Hi Ian,
I have a question regarding this part of the code, formerly in
seaice_budget_ice_if.F and now in seaice_solve4temp.F (non-legacy):
> c If the search falls below 50 Kelvin then kick the search back up to
> c TMELT. Note that a solution to the equation is for a large negative
> c value of ice surface temperature since the longwave outgoing radiation
> c goes as the fourth power of temperature.
> IF (tsurfLoc(I,J) .LT. 50.0 ) THEN
> tsurfLoc(I,J) = TMELT
> ENDIF
Does this fix a problem that can happen with the new saturation vapor
pressure (SVP) formulation ?
It seems to me that with the new (SVP), the search for tsurf looks
quite safe, with always dFiDTs1 > 0. May be I am missing something ?
If you could provide an example where this problem show-up, it would be nice.
Or was it something you added when trying to add the latent-heat derivative
relative to tsurf with the old SVP (Maykut polynomia) ?
In this case, I can understand that low temp can be a problem.
Cheers,
Jean-Michel
More information about the MITgcm-devel
mailing list