[MITgcm-devel] Add sea ice surface forcing to pkg/seaice

Menemenlis, Dimitris (3248) Dimitris.Menemenlis at jpl.nasa.gov
Mon Apr 23 19:25:44 EDT 2012


Jean-Michel, to address your concerns below and in previous two messages,
(and make sure that novice telemarkers will not be overwhelmed by too much fresh powder)

I can set AREA=1 when and where following conditions are met:
snowPrecipFile .NE. ' '
snowPrecip(i,j,bi,bj) .GT. ZERO
HSNOW .GT. siEps
or some slightly more adjoint-friendly version of above.

The assumption is that snowPrecip spreads evenly in each model grid box where it is non-zero.

Will that be OK?

Dimitris Menemenlis

On Apr 23, 2012, at 3:50 PM, Jean-Michel Campin wrote:

> Dimitris,
> 
> I am confused about your comments (i) to (v) below.
> For me, the actual snow thickness is more natural that 
> the effective one. Can do in-situ measurements. 
> If it does not exist in some parts of seaice_growth but still exists
> in seaice_solve4temp, it's going to be quite chalenging to explain 
> to new users how seaice pkg works.
> Point (iii) to (v) are even more confusing to me.
> 
> But to come back to my example of a good snow fall (> 1.cm/h) over 
> small fraction of seaice, which could be as low as 10^-5 for default
> SEAICE_area_reg=siEPS, within the same grid cell, the SST can 
> still be warm enough to be cooled by the latent heat of the snow 
> and to remain above freezing (no new ice formed). But instead of 
> doing this, the falling snow will increase the actual snow thickness 
> over seaice at a rate ~10^5 larger than the real accumulation rate.
> Can easily get 1.km of fresh snow (ye, fresh powder !) in an hour or so.
> 
> Cheers,
> Jean-Michel




More information about the MITgcm-devel mailing list