[MITgcm-devel] Add sea ice surface forcing to pkg/seaice
Menemenlis, Dimitris (3248)
Dimitris.Menemenlis at jpl.nasa.gov
Mon Apr 23 19:25:44 EDT 2012
Jean-Michel, to address your concerns below and in previous two messages,
(and make sure that novice telemarkers will not be overwhelmed by too much fresh powder)
I can set AREA=1 when and where following conditions are met:
snowPrecipFile .NE. ' '
snowPrecip(i,j,bi,bj) .GT. ZERO
HSNOW .GT. siEps
or some slightly more adjoint-friendly version of above.
The assumption is that snowPrecip spreads evenly in each model grid box where it is non-zero.
Will that be OK?
Dimitris Menemenlis
On Apr 23, 2012, at 3:50 PM, Jean-Michel Campin wrote:
> Dimitris,
>
> I am confused about your comments (i) to (v) below.
> For me, the actual snow thickness is more natural that
> the effective one. Can do in-situ measurements.
> If it does not exist in some parts of seaice_growth but still exists
> in seaice_solve4temp, it's going to be quite chalenging to explain
> to new users how seaice pkg works.
> Point (iii) to (v) are even more confusing to me.
>
> But to come back to my example of a good snow fall (> 1.cm/h) over
> small fraction of seaice, which could be as low as 10^-5 for default
> SEAICE_area_reg=siEPS, within the same grid cell, the SST can
> still be warm enough to be cooled by the latent heat of the snow
> and to remain above freezing (no new ice formed). But instead of
> doing this, the falling snow will increase the actual snow thickness
> over seaice at a rate ~10^5 larger than the real accumulation rate.
> Can easily get 1.km of fresh snow (ye, fresh powder !) in an hour or so.
>
> Cheers,
> Jean-Michel
More information about the MITgcm-devel
mailing list