[MITgcm-devel] testing with modified optfiles

[Jean-Michel Campin]

Hi Martin,

I have received 2 testreport output from sx8 (looks identical to me)
and as you say, they look good. Will move away 1 of them.
And regarding the unmodified SUPER-UX_SX-8_sxf90+mpi_awi,
it will be moved with the other after the next checkpoint.

Thanks a lot,
Jean-Michel

On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 02:32:12PM +0200, Martin Losch wrote:
> It looks like I cannot send emails to non-awi-addresses. Our system admin is on vacation, I'll try a workaround for now. I just send (by hand) the most recent test with the "new" merged opt file (*_awi) so you can move the other one to "unsupported" (really: it can be deleted, the only difference is the mpi option). 
> 
> Martin
> 
> On Sep 19, 2011, at 10:27 AM, Martin Losch wrote:
> 
> > Hi Jean-Michel,
> > 
> > the tests are OK, and I can send emails to myself. Not clear, why you (jmc at mitgcm.org) do not get any emails from sx8.awi.de anymore? Is the address correct? Just now I sent a short testreport and I am now running one with the new opt file, let's if they got/get through.
> > 
> > Martin
> > 
> > On Sep 14, 2011, at 1:28 PM, Martin Losch wrote:
> > 
> >> I don't know what wrong with the sx8 reports. The test are successfull, somewhere the email probably got lost. We just had a system "update" on the front end that deleted all useful editors and even the cvs client. It's possible that that's the reason. I'll look into that next week and then will also test the new opt file.
> >> 
> >> Martin
> >> 
> >> On Sep 14, 2011, at 1:28 AM, Jean-Michel Campin wrote:
> >> 
> >>> Hi Martin and Constantinos,
> >>> 
> >>> Martin, I did not see a recent test on sx8 (in september),
> >>> but if you restart this test, could you try the modified
> >>> optfile SUPER-UX_SX-8_sxf90_awi instead of the +mpi_awi one.
> >>> Since the plan is to move SUPER-UX_SX-8_sxf90+mpi_awi 
> >>> to build_options/unsupported/, it would be good to know 
> >>> that the modified one works.
> >>> 
> >>> Constantinos, If by chance you resume the test on bigred,
> >>> might be worth to try also with the modified optfile:
> >>> linux_ppc_xlf & linux_ppc64_xlf, + setting NETCDF_ROOT
> >>> (it's in the modified optfile top comments)
> >>> for the same reason.
> >>> 
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Jean-Michel
> >>> 
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> MITgcm-devel mailing list
> >>> MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
> >>> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel
> >> 
> >> 
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> MITgcm-devel mailing list
> >> MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
> >> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > MITgcm-devel mailing list
> > MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
> > http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> MITgcm-devel mailing list
> MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel