[MITgcm-devel] question about verification checks

[Jean-Michel Campin]

Hi Dimitris,

I think we are both right, because an atempt to link a file 
to an already existent file has no effect:
> danton{~}% touch titi toto
> danton{~}% ln -s titi tata
> danton{~}% ll tata
> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 jmc 4 03-02 20:42 tata -> titi
> danton{~}% ln -s toto tata
> ln: creating symbolic link `tata': File exists
> danton{~}% ll tata
> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 jmc 4 03-02 20:42 tata -> titi

Cheers,
Jean-Michel

On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 02:01:28PM -0800, Menemenlis, Dimitris (3248) wrote:
> JM just to clarify.  Is the order below correct?
> Wouldn't you want to be able to overwrite input/*
> with input.hb87/*, when these exist, rather than vice versa?
> 
> On Mar 2, 2011, at 11:42 AM, Jean-Michel Campin wrote:
> 
> > FWD secondary test (e.g.: lab_sea.hb87): link files from input.hb87 ; then link
> > files from input dir.
> > AD secondary test (e.g.: lab_sea.evp): link files from input_ad.evp ; then link
> > files from input_ad dir.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> MITgcm-devel mailing list
> MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel