[MITgcm-devel] [hdail at MIT.EDU: OBCS bug?]

[Martin Losch]

Hi,

I think that this should be fixed, although it's just an initialization.

Holly, do you see any differences when you use this part of the code?

Martin

On Feb 28, 2011, at 10:00 PM, Matthew Mazloff wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Yup, I guess that proves this piece of code isn't needed.  Otherwise, if people want it, then that should be changed to ALLOW_OBCS_CONTROL
> 
> -Matt
> 
> 
> On Feb 28, 2011, at 12:25 PM, Jean-Michel Campin wrote:
> 
>> Hi Holly,
>> I fwd to devel list, since I don't know much about this one.
>> Thanks,
>> Jean-Michel
>> 
>> ----- Forwarded message from Holly Dail <hdail at MIT.EDU> -----
>> 
>> From: Holly Dail <hdail at MIT.EDU>
>> Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 13:02:29 -0500
>> Subject: OBCS bug?
>> To: Jean-Michel Campin <jmc at ocean.mit.edu>
>> 
>> Hi Jean-Michel
>> 
>> Just noticed an oddity in the code ... there is only 1 place in the entire code base using
>> 
>> #ifdef OBCS_CONTROL
>> 
>> Everywhere else its ALLOW_OBCS_CONTROL.  Unless those two are somehow equivalent, maybe this piece of code isn't getting run?  The file is ecco_cost_init_barfiles.F in the ecco pkg.
>> 
>> Thanks -
>> Holly
>> ----- End forwarded message -----
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> MITgcm-devel mailing list
>> MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
>> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> MITgcm-devel mailing list
> MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel