[MITgcm-devel] [MITgcm-cvs] MITgcm/pkg/seaice CVS Commit

[Jean-Michel Campin]

Hi Martin,

I am going to re-run the standard test. Will give an update soon.
Cheers,
Jean-Michel

On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 03:21:29PM +0200, Martin Losch wrote:
> Hi there,
> did Patrick's second fix fix the problem (I forgot to adjust the keys when I changed the store directives, still not clear to my why it did work for me)? I am now getting 12 digits for global_ocean.cs32x15.seaice and 13 for lab_sea.evp on my machine with seaice_growth.F v1.139. The change to v1.136 that makes this difference is exactly the change of the storing. 
> 
> Did I introduce a bug, or do we need to update the output files?
> 
> Martin
> 
> On Jul 18, 2011, at 9:49 AM, Martin Losch wrote:
> 
> > Hi Jean-Michel,
> > 
> > I guess the TAF error was fixed by Patrick (it ran all OK for me, I don't understand what happened), lines were too long (thanks, Patrick).
> > 
> > I do not know why the gradient of global_ocean.cs32x15.seaice changed, again, for my platform it was all OK. Only three experiments seem to be affected: lab_sea, lab_sea.evp (which I assume is very unstable) and global_ocean.cs32x15.seaice (also on faulks). I changed a little bit of storage: instead of
> > CADJ STORE tice, ....
> > we now have
> > CADJ STORE tice(:,:,bi,bj)
> > (and similar for tices) in analogy to all other STORE directives. This means that in the adjoint code we no longer have code that copies 4D arrays within the bi/bj-loops. I can imagine that can have an effect on the numerical precision (although it shouldn't). In Ian's code (FENTY_AREA_EXPANSION_CONTRACTION) I added 3 lines:
> > d_AREAbyATM(I,J) = 0. _d 0
> > d_AREAbyICE(I,J) = 0. _d 0
> > d_AREAbyOCN(I,J) = 0. _d 0
> > but that part of the code is not tested in global_ocean.cs32x15.seaice nor lab_sea, as far as I can see. The other stuff I did (contracted two #ifdfe's into one) is not tested either. 
> > 
> > I'll have a closer look later.
> > 
> > Martin
> > 
> > 
> > On mitgcm.org/testing/results I see on beaudelaire for gfortran:
> >> run: ./testreport -adm -a jmc at mitgcm.org -match 13 -of=../tools/build_options/linux_amd64_gfortran+mpi_generic -MPI 6 -command 'mpirun -np TR_NPROC ./mitgcmuv_ad'
> > 
> >> Fri Jul 15 02:47:14 EDT 2011
> >> Y Y Y Y 16>12<FAIL  global_ocean.cs32x15.seaice
> >> Y Y Y Y 16>16<pass  lab_sea
> >> Y Y Y Y 16>12<FAIL  lab_sea.evp
> > and
> >> Sun Jul 17 02:46:03 EDT 2011
> > 
> >> Y Y Y Y 16>10<FAIL  global_ocean.cs32x15.seaice
> >> Y Y Y Y 16>13<pass  lab_sea
> >> Y Y Y Y 16>12<FAIL  lab_sea.evp
> > 
> > for 
> >> Fri Jul 15 01:03:19 EDT 2011
> >> run: ./testreport -adm -a jmc at mitgcm.org -match 13 -of=../tools/build_options/linux_amd64_gfortran
> >> Y Y Y Y 16>16<pass  global_ocean.cs32x15.seaice
> >> Y Y Y Y 16>16<pass  lab_sea
> >> Y Y Y Y 16>16<pass  lab_sea.evp
> > and
> >> Sun Jul 17 01:03:23 EDT 2011
> >> Y Y Y Y 16>10<FAIL  global_ocean.cs32x15.seaice
> >> Y Y Y Y 16>13<pass  lab_sea
> >> Y Y Y Y 16>12<FAIL  lab_sea.evp
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >> On Jul 16, 2011, at 2:42 PM, Jean-Michel Campin wrote:
> > 
> > 
> >> Hi Martin,
> >> 
> >> Looks like there is a problem in the changes you made in seaice_growth.F:
> >> TAF returns an error for lab_sea experiment (all last night AD lab_sea tests 
> >> I loooked at failed). 
> >> 
> >> The gradient of global_ocean.cs32x15.seaice also changed (from 16.digits
> >> to only 10 on ref. platform=baudelaire+gfortran) so that it's now
> >> returnning a "FAIL". Was it expected ? Do we need to update
> >> output_adm.seaice.txt ?
> >> 
> >> Cheers,
> >> Jean-Michel
> >> 
> >> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 09:01:07AM -0400, Martin Losch wrote:
> >>> Update of /u/gcmpack/MITgcm/pkg/seaice
> >>> In directory forge:/tmp/cvs-serv6974/pkg/seaice
> >>> 
> >>> Modified Files:
> >>> 	seaice_growth.F 
> >>> Log Message:
> >>> - fix recomputation with FENTY_AREA_EXPANSION_CONTRACTION code,
> >>>   remove then obsolete STORE directives
> >>> - fix STORE directives for tice and tices, so that only the
> >>>   appropriate part of the fields are stored (and not the entire
> >>>   field)
> >>> - cosmetic changes: adjust CPP flags and indentation for better
> >>>   legibilty
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> MITgcm-cvs mailing list
> >>> MITgcm-cvs at mitgcm.org
> >>> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-cvs
> >> 
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> MITgcm-devel mailing list
> >> MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
> >> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel
> > 
> > Martin Losch
> > Martin.Losch at awi.de
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > MITgcm-devel mailing list
> > MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
> > http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> MITgcm-devel mailing list
> MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel