[MITgcm-devel] inconsistencies with density conversion

[Ian Fenty]

Jean-Michel,

Step 1 is complete and the testing passed last night and I documented 
the change in tag-index.  Shall I proceed to step 2 or would you like to 
checkpoint first?

Ian

On Mon, Jean-Michel wrote:


> I prefer to group in step.1 the changes in data (rhoConstFresh)
> and data.seaice (ICE2WATR + SEAICE_X values),
> because this is all about getting better constants with the same code.
>
> Then in step.2, changes in pkg/seaice/seaice_growth.F (to fix what
> you spotted);
>
> And renaming SEAICE_salinity (and/or SEAICE_VARIABLE_SALINITY) can be
> put in setp.3, because it's always anoying to rename parameters which
> are set in namelist (need to put them in "retired" list and
> stop if they are found in data.seaice), and would need also to
> stop if the old OPTION "SEAICE_SALINITY" is found to be defined.
>
> But I don't know precisely when to do the checkpoint (I though
> I would do it after step.1, but might see how thing are going).
>
> Cheers,
> Jean-Michel