[MITgcm-devel] seaice_growth_if.F
Menemenlis, Dimitris (3248)
Dimitris.Menemenlis at jpl.nasa.gov
Tue Sep 21 23:07:59 EDT 2010
Ian, great that you are tooling away on sea ice code.
Regarding your question below, I think you need to separate
freshwater and salt flux when
useRealFreshWaterFlux=.TRUE.,
otherwise you will not get the correct ocean volume change.
I agree that if useRealFreshWaterFlux=.FALSE.,
then it is OK to lump everything in EmPmR.
D.
On Sep 21, 2010, at 7:56 PM, Ian G. Fenty wrote:
> There is no contribution to salt flux because I am using EmPmR alone to
> make seawater salinity adjustments. Is using EmPmR alone is no longer
> considered good form. If I understand it correctly, the default current
> seaice_growth.F gives the volume of ice grown or melted to EmPmR (which
> I read as saying that the ice is fresh) and separately determines the
> ice's salt and gives that to saltFlux so that seawater salinity is
> adjusted properly. Is there some reason to prefer that method?
More information about the MITgcm-devel
mailing list