[MITgcm-devel] recent check-in

[Gael Forget]

I was expecting that email. You should not see any ad test compile right now.

I am pretty sure this problem results from the TAF v2 default switch that has 
happened (between 3AM and 4AM this morning). Since then my requests 
to TAF do not return a ad_taf_output.f file -- I get an ad_input_codead.f 
instead -- so that compilation fails. In the short term we want to specify 
'-v1' in our adof files somewhere I believe.  I would make mistakes, and 
I not want to mess the optfiles up, so I will leave it to you or Patrick. 

Of course there can always be an issue with one of my modifications,
but I did not check-in anything that did not pass pass the fwd&ad 
lab_sea tests on faulks (and my laptop). The subsequent 
seaice-growth.F check-ins are waiting for this validation in fact.

Cheers,
Gael


On Oct 1, 2010, at 9:20 AM, Jean-Michel Campin wrote:

> Hi Patrick and Gael,
> 
> I don't know which changes cause problems, but several AD tests
> did not compile this morning (on faulks, aces, dickens ...).
> Or is it this switch:
>> # TAF 2.0 IS THE DEFAULT!!!
> 
> Also, the parameter you added in PARAMS.h does not have its
> 1 line description (as most of the parameters in PARAMS.h do).
> Should I invent a short description or do you want to add one ?
> 
> Thanks,
> Jean-Michel
> 
> _______________________________________________
> MITgcm-devel mailing list
> MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel