[MITgcm-devel] iMin, iMax, jMin, and jMax in EXTERNAL_FORCING_T

[Patrick Heimbach]

Hong,

I don't understand your question:
The appearance of tile edges in xx_ or adxx_ fields
is *unrelated* to problems in code external_forcing_...

It seems to me, it's important to narrow down what/where the issue is.

-Patrick



On Feb 1, 2010, at 4:24 PM, Hong Zhang wrote:

> Matthew Mazloff wrote:
>>
>> If I remember correctly
>> ADJustress and ADJvstress show tile edges -- I think this is just  
>> an issue with gridding (a vs c grid) and exchanges -- because I  
>> don't believe adxx_taux and adxx_tauy show this pattern
>> let me know if you want me to confirm this as Xuebin, a postdoc  
>> here at SIO, has looked into this
>>
>> Just throwing this out there -- sorry if its off topic, I didn;t  
>> follow the whole thread,
>> Matt
> Hi Matt,
> we also see tile edges in adxx_atemp so we don't think it's just a  
> gridding (a vs c grid) issue. please see figs of adxx_atemp and  
> xx_atemp: adxx_atemp.png xx_atemp.png Do you see any tiles in your  
> adxx_atemp fields? Hong
> _______________________________________________
> MITgcm-devel mailing list
> MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel

---
Patrick Heimbach | heimbach at mit.edu | http://www.mit.edu/~heimbach
MIT | EAPS 54-1518 | 77 Massachusetts Ave | Cambridge MA 02139 USA
FON +1-617-253-5259 | FAX +1-617-253-4464 | SKYPE patrick.heimbach