[MITgcm-devel] 3 pm

[Ian Fenty]

Patrick, I looked for you but your office seems overrun.  If you have 
time, I'm in my office but I can only meet for the next 30 minutes or 
so.  If not today, we can meet tomorrow.
-Ian


Patrick Heimbach wrote:
> 
> Hi Hong
> I didn't understand your argument below
> (but would be relieved if it wasn't due to the ctrl package).
> -p.
> 
> On Feb 1, 2010, at 1:12 PM, Hong Zhang wrote:
> 
>> Patrick Heimbach wrote:
>>>
>>> Dimitris,
>>>
>>> not sure how to narrow this down.
>>> Is problem visible only in the xx_* adjustment fields or also in full 
>>> uwind variables?
>>> What I'm trying to get at is whether this is purely related
>>> to something in the ctrl package or in the exf package or in model/src.
>>> Depending on the case, the routines external_forcing_* wouldn't have
>>> anything to do with it and you're on a wrong track.
>>>
>>> Several things to check:
>>> Plot the *full* uwind, vwind fields as obtained from pkg/diagnostics
>>> both for iter0 and for iterX
>>>
>>> Since you're adding xx_uwind onto first guess, it should also be visible
>>> in the full field, except for iter0 where xx_uwind == 0
>>> What about wind stresses?
>>> Is there a problem there as well?
>>>
>> Hi Patrick,
>> I guess the edge problem doesn't come from pkg/ctrl
>> as adxx_atemp, adxx_wind, adxx_vwind
>> have the similar patter beforehand.
>> tauXbar and tauYbar (averaged from ustress/vstress)
>> don't have this edges (iter0 and iterX).
>>
>> hong
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> MITgcm-devel mailing list
>> MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
>> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel
> 
> ---
> Patrick Heimbach | heimbach at mit.edu | http://www.mit.edu/~heimbach
> MIT | EAPS 54-1518 | 77 Massachusetts Ave | Cambridge MA 02139 USA
> FON +1-617-253-5259 | FAX +1-617-253-4464 | SKYPE patrick.heimbach
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> MITgcm-devel mailing list
> MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel