[MITgcm-devel] iMin, iMax, jMin, and jMax in EXTERNAL_FORCING_T

[Matthew Mazloff]

If I remember correctly
ADJustress and ADJvstress show tile edges -- I think this is just an  
issue with gridding (a vs c grid) and exchanges -- because I don't  
believe adxx_taux and adxx_tauy show this pattern
let me know if you want me to confirm this as Xuebin, a postdoc here  
at SIO, has looked into this

Just throwing this out there -- sorry if its off topic, I didn;t  
follow the whole thread,
Matt


On Feb 1, 2010, at 10:12 AM, Hong Zhang wrote:

> Patrick Heimbach wrote:
>>
>> Dimitris,
>>
>> not sure how to narrow this down.
>> Is problem visible only in the xx_* adjustment fields or also in full
>> uwind variables?
>> What I'm trying to get at is whether this is purely related
>> to something in the ctrl package or in the exf package or in model/ 
>> src.
>> Depending on the case, the routines external_forcing_* wouldn't have
>> anything to do with it and you're on a wrong track.
>>
>> Several things to check:
>> Plot the *full* uwind, vwind fields as obtained from pkg/diagnostics
>> both for iter0 and for iterX
>>
>> Since you're adding xx_uwind onto first guess, it should also be  
>> visible
>> in the full field, except for iter0 where xx_uwind == 0
>> What about wind stresses?
>> Is there a problem there as well?
>>
> Hi Patrick,
> I guess the edge problem doesn't come from pkg/ctrl
> as adxx_atemp, adxx_wind, adxx_vwind
> have the similar patter beforehand.
> tauXbar and tauYbar (averaged from ustress/vstress)
> don't have this edges (iter0 and iterX).
>
> hong
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> MITgcm-devel mailing list
> MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel