[MITgcm-devel] iMin, iMax, jMin, and jMax in EXTERNAL_FORCING_T
Hong Zhang
hong.zhang at caltech.edu
Mon Feb 1 13:12:48 EST 2010
Patrick Heimbach wrote:
>
> Dimitris,
>
> not sure how to narrow this down.
> Is problem visible only in the xx_* adjustment fields or also in full
> uwind variables?
> What I'm trying to get at is whether this is purely related
> to something in the ctrl package or in the exf package or in model/src.
> Depending on the case, the routines external_forcing_* wouldn't have
> anything to do with it and you're on a wrong track.
>
> Several things to check:
> Plot the *full* uwind, vwind fields as obtained from pkg/diagnostics
> both for iter0 and for iterX
>
> Since you're adding xx_uwind onto first guess, it should also be visible
> in the full field, except for iter0 where xx_uwind == 0
> What about wind stresses?
> Is there a problem there as well?
>
Hi Patrick,
I guess the edge problem doesn't come from pkg/ctrl
as adxx_atemp, adxx_wind, adxx_vwind
have the similar patter beforehand.
tauXbar and tauYbar (averaged from ustress/vstress)
don't have this edges (iter0 and iterX).
hong
More information about the MITgcm-devel
mailing list